The final regulations for the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP) Program are similar to the draft version of the CO-OP regulations posted in July, according to Paul Keckley.
Keckley, executive director at the Deloitte Center for Health Care Solutions, Washington, says in a comment on the final CO-OP rule, which is set to appear in the Federal Register Tuesday, that one of the most notable feature is the definitions regulators use.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is developing CO-OP program regulations in an effort create a new breed of nonprofit, member-owned health plans.
Members of Congress put the CO-OP program provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) to create a compromise between Democrats who wanted PPACA to create a government-run “public option” and Democrats who wanted PPACA to preserve the current commercial health insurance market as much as possible.
What Your Peers Are Reading
A CO-OP is supposed to make “substantially all” of its sales to individuals and small groups.
A CO-OP could operate in a whole state or in part of a state, or it could operate in multiple states. A CO-OP would be licensed as an insurer in each state in which it operates.
The CO-OP section of PPACA, PPACA Section 1322, calls for HHS to make $3.8 billion in CO-OP startup loans available to would-be CO-OP organizers.
HHS officials say in the preamble to the final rule that they proposed that “substantially all” of their business could mean two-thirds of their business. Some commenters suggested that regulators simply require the CO-OPs to get half of their business from individuals and small groups; other commenters suggested that the CO-OPs should get 80% to 90% of their business from individuals and small groups.
HHS officials ended up making “substantially all” two-thirds in the final rule.