Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Retirement Planning > Retirement Investing > Annuity Investing

The Pipeworks

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Sales of variable annuities with living benefit riders have become a star product on Wall Street, quietly allowing insurance companies to become dominant players in an otherwise bleak market, not just for equities but for all financial markets. So much so, in fact, that variable annuities with living benefit riders are strengthening the ability of insurers to compete with mutual funds, which cannot provide guarantees on yields.

“The target market is those investors who like equity markets,” with the potential upside, in a play on words, “that it provides downside protection,” according to Neil Strauss, vice president and a senior credit officer at Moody’s Investors Service.

But the flip side is that the industry, analysts, rating agencies and even regulators are riding the wave with caution. And, interestingly, it appears everyone is on the same page with the issues presented with the strong demand for these riders in VAs.

They are quite aware that providing guarantees on equity products got the industry into a whale of trouble in late 2007, when the economy and markets turned south to an extent unprecedented since the Great Depression.

“I think insurance companies can book this business profitably, but it is not a walk through the park, because there are market pressures,” said Andrew Kligerman, a life insurance analyst at UBS Securities in New York said.

Insurers felt a great deal of pain when investment markets tanked in 2008 and 2009 because of the living benefit products they had written before then, Kligerman said. He noted that when writing this kind of business, insurers need to be mindful of deferred acquisition charges, capital charges, living benefit reserve and death benefit reserve charges.

The business can be written profitably—but it is a company-dependent process,” he said. “I think they will do it better this time.”

Another interesting issue associated with the new trend is that the market has become concentrated, with three players—MetLife, Prudential and Jackson Life—dominating. All three offer lower yields than their competitors.

But, while the rest of the industry offers higher yields, they are controlling their risk by limiting their distribution. They are also adjusting product offerings continually in order to maintain market share while minimizing risk, according to Moody’s and Morningstar.

The focus on VAs with living benefit riders became clear last week when LIMRA, based in Windsor, Conn., which tracks insurance market statistics, revealed third quarter statistics.

“While third quarter VA sales were two percent lower than second quarter results, VAs performed significantly better than the market, which was down 15%,” according to Joseph Montminy, assistant vice president for LIMRA’s annuity research.

He said the “equity markets in the third quarter were the most volatile we have experienced since the financial crisis began in late 2008, yet consumers’ demand for guaranteed lifetime income helped sustain VA sales.”

LIMRA said VA sales have experienced six consecutive quarters of positive growth—the last three in double digits.

Also consistent with LIMRA, Morningstar Director of Insurance Solutions Frank O’Connor, speaking for the IRI, said the surge in net sales “is a very positive development, indicating rapidly growing interest in the use of variable annuity guaranteed income benefits as an important component of a portfolio designed to produce sustainable income throughout one’s retirement.”

By contrast, fixed annuity sales continued to struggle in a hyper-low interest rate environment, and insurers said they  are lowering steps on annuities with living benefit riders in order to protect profitability, LIMRA said.

Fixed annuity sales fell 6% in the third quarter and down one percent for the first nine months of 2011, according to LIMRA. AIG Companies paced sales in this category with $6.9 billion in sales in the third quarter.

Total fixed annuity sales equaled $20.2 billion in the third quarter and $61.9 billion in the first nine months of 2011, LIMRA said.

Indeed, Morningstar, which tracks all consumer-oriented financial markets, says annuity sales because of living benefit riders could allow insurers to equal or perhaps exceed their prior high in annuity sales, $184 billion in 2007.

“The reason is that the insurance industry is providing guarantees not available anywhere else, said Strauss of Moody’s.

“The key here is the guarantees,” Strauss said. “Even if the equity markets don’t do well, you get some sort of return. Generally, that is not available anywhere else.”

He said they have been charging a higher fee for the guarantee; and they have also done more hedging of the equity and interest rate risk in the product.

Strauss said insurers have also changed the product somewhat so that the policyholder may have less asset-allocation choices.

“Policyholders are being forced to allocate their assets in a less risky fashion, more towards fixed income securities under certain circumstances,” Strauss said.

“If the equity markets are doing badly, the insurers could require the policyholders to invest less in equities and more in bond funds,” he said.

For insurers in general, the trend is toward the company having greater control and the policyholder having less opportunity to allocate the investments as he or she might desire, Strauss explained. “For the consumer, there are less choices, more limitations,” he said. “These initiatives provide protection to the company in a stress scenario,” adds Strauss.

“This appears to be an industry-wide trend, at least among the larger players we monitor, and provide ratings for,” Strauss said.

Federal regulators are very much aware of the growth in demand for VAs with living benefit riders.

In a conference sponsored by the American Bar Association for insurance industry lawyers, the top cop for insurance products sounded the alarm.

Eileen Rominger, director of the SEC Investment Management Division, told the lawyers what the SEC is keeping an eye on them regarding VAs with living benefits.

These concerns include the disclosures related to VAs with a living benefit feature that use derivatives to enhance yields, about the “guarantees” included in these products, and about living benefit products that limit the investment options offered to purchasers.

Rominger “encouraged” insurers and their lawyers to assess the effectiveness of disclosures in VAs that feature living benefits and use derivatives to enhance yields.

She said that this should include elimination of boilerplate disclosures that do not reflect the actual use of derivatives in a fund’s portfolio.

In the third quarter, VA guaranteed living benefit riders were elected 88% of the time, when a GLB was available at purchase. In the first nine months of 2011, VA sales jumped 18%, to reach $120.9 billion.

Total annuity sales hit $60.4 billion in the third quarter, an increase of 8% compared to prior year, LIMRA said. Year-to-date, annuity sales reached $182.8 billion, improving 11% from the first nine months of 2010.

The clear leader was MetLife. Its sales jumped 45.6% compared to a year ago, from $4.66 billion in the third quarter of 2010 to $8.56 billion in the third quarter of this year.

Prudential was second to MetLife in the third quarter, selling $4.48 billion of VAs. Pru sales declined from $5.37 billion a year earlier. Jackson Life was third, followed by TIAA-CREF and Lincoln National.

The top five sellers of VAs accounted for 56.3% of sales industrywide in the first nine months of the year, up from 54.6% a year earlier.

At the same time, market reports indicated that the tight market conditions had forced John Hancock, based in Boston, to lay off personnel in its annuities unit, announce moves to pare offers, and will also reduce its offerings of fixed, variable and immediate annuities.

John Hancock eliminated approximately 116 positions at various locations in Boston, due to the restructuring of its annuity business and a streamlining of its infrastructure.

Hancock spokesperson Beth McGoldrick said some employees were also redeployed to our growing mutual funds and 401(k) businesses.

“We are actively hiring and have approximately 110 open positions,” she said.

“The positions are from a variety of functions within the affected business units including IT, marketing, operations, distribution and finance,” she said.

McGoldrick confirmed that the annuity restructuring was due to volatile equity markets and the historically low interest rate environment that is expected to continue for an extended period of time.

“Going forward, our annuities will be sold only through a narrow group of key partners such as John Hancock Financial Network,” McGoldrick said.

“John Hancock will continue its award-winning service to its annuity clients, who will see no change in how their accounts are handled,” she said.

Regarding MetLife, Steve Kandarian, new president and chief executive officer of MetLife, said during the conference call on the company’s third quarter earnings Oct. 28 that MetLife’s Guaranteed Living Investment Benefit rider is currently 5.5%, down from earlier guarantees, and will be reduced to 5% at the beginning of the year.

Kandarian said that the variable annuity market continues to experience strong growth.

At the same time, “we are taking a proactive approach to managing the growth of our variable annuity business,” he said. “We…recently adjusted our GMIB Max offering to reduce risk and improve returns and we will be making further adjustments in January.”

He said that while “we are comfortable with the pricing and returns on our third-quarter VA sales, we continue to seek opportunities to re-price and improve the risk profile of our product offerings.”

He added that MetLife was closely monitoring sales and if they were to rise above plan, there are steps the company could take to bring its sales volume back in line.

He told analysts that they can be “assured that we are reviewing all of our product features to maintain a disciplined balance between customer value, risk and return.

“As a matter of sound capital management, we will only pursue growth that we believe maximizes long-term shareholder value,” Kandarian said.

Catherine Theroux, assistant director of public relations for LIMRA, said the firm has been publicly reporting the growth of living benefit riders since 2007, but the trend toward strong growth of these riders in VAs began a little earlier. In 2002, for example, when the technology boom ended and the value of equities plunged, there was a strong uptick, she said.

Purchase of VAs with GLB riders has increased consistently since 2007. It shot up 4% in fourth quarter of 2008 and has maintained that level since 2008.

“Consumers are attracted to these guarantees in a volatile market,” Theroux said.

She noted that the decline in certificate of deposit interest rates offered by banks and savings and loans began at the same time.

“We believe they have become so popular because people are seeking security, and Guaranteed Living Benefit riders offer that security,” Theroux said.

She said that in the first quarter of 2007, 76% of VA contracts purchased including the living benefit rider. It has increased significantly since then. For example, in the fourth quarter of 2008, right after the economic crisis became evident, the election rate shot up to 89%. In the first quarter of 2009, it rose to 90%.

“What is important to note is that after VA sales with GLB riders reached the height of 90% in first quarter of 2009, it has stayed at the 87-89% level

Prior to the current uptrend, the election rate was only 84% in the third quarter of 2008, she said, even though at that time it was a record number.

Theroux said LIMRA also saw a significant jump in fixed annuity sales in the October 2008-March 2009 period.

She said that fixed annuities became very popular as interest in variable products and securities declined. She said that despite growth in fixed annuity sales, “when people bought VAs, and a GLB rider was offered, it became very popular.”

She noted that fixed  annuity purchases strengthened between 2007, when $73 billion were purchased, and 2008, when $109 billion were purchased. 


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.