Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
July 25, 2011 at 08:00 PM
Among the grumblings often heard about education for life insurance and financial service professionals is that there are too many professional designations. It’s a fair criticism: Advisors can now choose from scores of programs, many of which cover retirement planning for seniors.
And yet, there remains a critical need for technical expertise in one area that is experiencing rising demand: counseling for domestic partners. This group encompasses gay and lesbian couples, whose planning issues I explore in my feature article beginning on p.14. It includes also bisexual and transgender folks, as well as unmarried heterosexual couples and grandparents living with adult children.
According to 2005-2007 U.S. Census estimates, more than a 12 million unmarried partners live in the U.S. The need for insurance and financial planning is significant: Nearly half of GLBT boomers say they do not expect to retire until age 70 because of a lack of financial preparedness. And just 31% of LGBT boomers say they are financially prepared for retirement.
Such numbers are hardly surprising, given that they dovetail with the abysmal statistics among pre-retirees generally. What concerns me is that many advisors lack a proper grounding in the planning needs of unmarried couples, as well as same-sex couples whose marriages are recognized by their home state, but not under federal law.
The dearth of planning expertise is likely to be keenly felt in coming years as more of these couples seek counseling on the full panoply of financial issues: marriage, divorce, wealth accumulation and wealth transfer, business and retirement income planning, among other areas.
Advisors can save their clients heartache by becoming familiar with tools that many domestic partners are likely to need. Example: a transfer- (or payable-) on-death bank account, which allows individuals to bypass probate court when passing assets to heirs. One need only complete a form, provided by the bank, naming the domestic partner (or other heir) as the beneficiary of the money at the account holder’s death.
Lynn Elmer, the Principal Financial Group advisor I interviewed for my feature, says she counseled a gay couple of 27 years to do this–but only after the bank of one of the partners had failed to bring this strategy to his attention. Without a TOD account, the partner’s assets could be directed to blood relatives by a probate court, leaving a surviving partner bereft of a nest egg.
