The leaders of a House Ways and Means subcommittee want the Treasury Department to warn seniors about the possible tax consequences of getting involved in stranger-originated life insurance arrangements.
In a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., chairman of the Select Revenue Measures Subcommittee, and Rep. Phil English, R-Pa., the most senior Republican on the subcommittee, write that STOLI marketers often use cruises or expensive dinner vouchers to persuade elderly individuals to accept “free” life insurance.
The STOLI policies themselves are under the jurisdiction of the states, not the Treasury Department, but the federal rules governing split-dollar arrangements and cancellation of indebtedness also may come into play, Neal and English write.
“In certain cases, the terms for the initial arrangement may not qualify as true indebtedness, thus exposing the insured to income inclusion,” Neal and English write. “Also, depending upon the value of the promotional incentive or cash payment, the insured could be taxed on the value of the promotion received. Depending upon the structure of the product promoters may also be liable for information reporting.”
What Your Peers Are Reading
Neal and English note that they do not want to interfere with policyholders’ ability to sell policies.