Close Close

Life Health > Health Insurance > Life Insurance Strategies

Researchers Find Wide Variations In Pay-For-Pay Programs

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Health insurer efforts to measure and report the quality of doctors and hospitals are in their infancy.

A PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.C. team led a health industries specialist in the firm’s McLean, Va., office have come to that conclusion in a study based on a review of 10 established “pay for performance” programs.

The federal government wants to make “P4P” compensation a standard part of government health finance programs, but a review of the existing private-sector P4P efforts shows that if “you’ve seen one pay-for-performance program…you’ve seen one pay-for-performance program,” the PricewaterhouseCoopers researchers write.

The companies use about 60 indicators to measure performance, but no single indicator is used by all 10 plans, the researchers report.

More on this topic

Only 1 plan looked at whether doctors helped smokers to quit smoking, and only 1 looked at patients’ satisfaction with their level of access to a physician.

Despite reports of New York regulators expressing concern about performance-based compensation systems, most carriers seem to be leery about creating “tiered” provider networks or taking other aggressive steps to steer patients toward higher-rated providers, the researchers report.

In many cases, the payment system is so broken down that P4P programs seem to be “putting lipstick on a pig,” industry players told the researchers.