Users of health account plans appear to be less satisfied than users of traditional managed care plans.
Consultants at Towers Perrin Inc., Stamford, Conn., have published data supporting that conclusion in a report that compares members of traditional managed care plans with members of plans that offer access to health savings accounts or health reimbursement arrangements.
Only 50% of the account plan members said they are satisfied or very satisfied with the ability of their current plans to protect them against the risk of major health care costs, compared with 65% who are not members of account plans.
Account plan members said they are even less satisfied with other aspects of their plans.
What Your Peers Are Reading
In theory, HSAs and HRAs are supposed to help holders save for retirement, but only 22% of the account plan members said they are satisfied or very satisfied with the ability of the plans to help them prepare for retirement health care expenses, compared with 30% of the traditional plan members.
Only 16% of the health account holders said they are using the accounts to save for retirement health care expenses.
About 71% of the account plan members who believe their plans protect them against major health care risks said their plans are easy to understand and use, but only 16% of the dissatisfied account plan members said their plans are plans are easy to understand and use.
The survey results imply that satisfied health account plan members may be more likely to try to take an active role in their care than the dissatisfied members are.
Only 45% of the dissatisfied members said they explore risks and costs before following doctors’ recommendations, but about 64% of the satisfied members said they do so.
Dave Guilmette, managing director of Towers Perrin’s health and welfare practice, says the results show employers and health account plan companies have to do more to reach out to employees if they want the programs to expand.