Many U.S. workers like the idea of getting retirement savings advice through a face-to-face meeting with a financial professional.
Researchers with Mathew Greenwald & Associates and the Employee Benefit Research Institute, both of Washington, published data supporting that conclusion in the 2005 Retirement Confidence Survey.
The researchers based their data on telephone interviews with 1,001 U.S. workers age 25 and older and 252 retirees.
Although 87% of the survey participants told interviewers they have used retirement planning advice from spouses, 57% have used advice from other friends and relatives, 55% have used written materials received at work, and 63% said they have used advice from financial professionals.
When interviewers asked the participants who already were saving for retirement which resources were the most helpful, financial professionals ran away with the race: 38% of the savers said they found advice from financial professionals to be the most helpful resource. About 17% of the savers identified friends and non-spouse relatives as the most helpful resource, and 11% of the savers said their spouses were the most helpful resource.
Fewer than 10% of the savers said information from the Internet, information from the television or radio, or information from seminars was the most useful.
“The likelihood of finding a financial professional most helpful is higher among workers with household incomes of at least $35,000 and those who have some college education or more,” the researchers write in the survey report.
Professionals vs. Budgets vs. Books
When interviewers asked all participants, including those who were saving for retirement and those who had not started saving for retirement, about their resource preferences, professional financial advisors again came in first, with 37% of all survey participants identifying “professional financial advisors” or “a professional calculation” of retirement saving needs as the most useful retirement saving tools.
Having a budget came in second, with strong appeal for 15% of the survey participants, and reading a retirement planning book came in third, with strong appeal for 11% of the participants, according to EBRI.
People vs. Computers vs. Telephones
Workers without current access to employment-based retirement investment advice were far more interested in face-to-face meeting with advisors than with getting advice through the Web or through the telephone: 64% of those workers said they were at least somewhat likely to use in-person investment advice.
But the workers were interested mainly in talking to “live human beings” that they could see. Only 28% of the workers were somewhat or very likely to talk to advisors on the telephone, while 45% were open to the idea of getting retirement investment advice through the Web.
The EBRI researchers also looked at plan features that might persuade workers who do not yet participate in 401(k) plans and similar plans to do so.
The most popular feature was an employer matching contribution of up to 5% of the employees salary, with strong appeal for 31% of the workers sitting on the sidelines. A 3% matching contribution had strong appeal for only 16% of the workers on the sidelines. Having a financial professional held strong appeal for only 15% of the workers on the sidelines, but 21% of those workers said they liked the idea of investing in a lifecycle fund designed for workers within certain age groups.
Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, April 8, 2005. Copyright 2005 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.