Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
September 14, 2004 at 08:00 PM
The following letters are responses from a pair of readers to an article in the current issue of Investment Advisor. (Read the article here. Offer your own comments on this article, or any others, here.)
Letter # 1:
“Embrace the Middle Class” by Dr. Condon (Investment Advisor September 2004) correctly brings up many of the challenges of providing professional financial services to the middle class. It also reinforces my long-held contention that the prototypical CFP is ill-equipped to serve it.
I would submit this heretical premise: The vast majority of potential clients in this arena don’t need a financial plan. At least not one that costs $1,500 and takes three meetings to implement. They typically need four things:
Well-defined goals and objectives;
Protection from catastrophic losses;
A balanced budget; and
A disciplined, sustainable long-term savings and investment plan.
Certainly they will need advice and direction on other specific life issues, such as college planning, retirement planning and insurance as needs arise. But what most of these folks will end up with is what they need the most, and can afford: a solid plan of insurance protection, such as a $500K term policy, and a regular monthly investment plan of a couple hundred dollars into mutual funds. Even in a fully commissioned world, that would generate relatively small fees, maybe a couple hundred dollars per household, and a minimal annual trail. How many meetings and how much back-office planning time could a traditional CFP afford to give these folks?
As sure as there is a time value of money concept, all professionals operate under a “money value of time” dilemma. I believe strongly that other financial professionals, such as the family insurance agent, may well be best-suited to serve this sector. They have strong relationships in place, and quite often have access to some of the best support professionals in the industry through their home offices. I work for such a company, and can truthfully say that I’ve seen the full range of competence and incompetence. But I’ve seen the same in the RIA/CFP world as well. Dedication and professional commitment should be sought out in all cases. Sadly, however, groups such as the FPA continue to be “CFP-centric” and refuse to recognize the validity of rigorous designations such as CLU/Chartered Life Underwriter or ChFC/Chartered Financial Consultant. For this very reason, I continue to forego membership in the FPA.
