Traitorous? Ridiculous
To The Editor:
The following is a letter that I sent to Mr. Prousalis after reading his letter to the editor in the April 19 issue of National Underwriter and which I give you permission to reprint.
Let me introduce myself as the father of 6, with 8 grandchildren. Four of the 6 are married, the other 2 are gay. I never thought of them as being traitorousthat is the 2 who are gay. Or for that matter, the gay friends of my children, my grandchildren and some of our friends who are also gay.
All of these individuals participate in their own way in civic activities, hold responsible positions in their employment and are charitable to a fault. I know of no one in this entire groupgay or otherwisewho promote and/or believe in gay marriage. Quite the contrary. They believe in some formal civil union by which all could enjoy the rights given to us by the founding fathers and that our government should stay out of our bedrooms (and yours).
I am a prolific letter writer given to a vitriolic tone in a good many of those letters. I cant get to that level with you because you are so totally ignorant of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution that you are intellectually incapable of understanding their meaning.
Alan J. Shactman
Danvers, Mass.
Dont Limit Possibilities
To The Editor:
Im an over 50 years old, heterosexual male and people continue to amaze me. I just finished reading “Life After Gay Life” (see The Editors Edge, April 19) and had to comment.
I, too, was somewhat homophobic until a few years ago when I started singing with a large mens group that contains several “gay” partners. Since that time, I have observed that in many cases, monogamous gay couples (of either sex) tend to be more loving and sensitive than many of their hetero counterparts. Take, for example, those who sent you the vile e-mails.
I dont personally like the gay lifestyle for myself, but I also dont like car racing, sheep shearing festivals or sand sledding. To shut people out because they do like these activities is simply to limit both their and ones own possibilities. Perhaps those who canceled their subscriptions should turn in their CLUs and, instead, take up conducting sand dune tours in Iraq.
Name Withheld By Request
How About A Pittance Tax?
To The Editor:
Would you prefer a “pittance” tax?