NU Online News Service, Feb. 18, 2004, 6:03 p.m. EST – Regulators are still deciding how to frame the new reserve rules for variable annuity guarantees.[@@]
Officials with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Kansas City, Mo., are talking about whether any new guidance should be retroactive and whether the guidance should take the form of a law, a regulation or an actuarial guideline.
The American Academy of Actuaries, Washington, is working on VA guarantee reserve valuation for the NAIC. NAIC officials plan to discuss the reserve issue in March, at an NAIC meeting in New York.
Implementing an actuarial guideline would be easier and quicker than creating a new law or regulation, but a new law or regulation might provide more legal certainty, officials say.
NAIC officials are also interested in issues such as due process and consistency with the existing Standard Valuation Law, the law that actuaries now use to determine annuity reserves.
If state legislatures had a chance to discuss and vote on the proposed changes, or state insurance regulators had to go through their standard rulemaking procedures, that would help ensure that insurers would receive due process, officials say.
Some officials have suggested that the NAIC could proceed by including new VA guarantee reserve requirements in the NAIC’s Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual, but Sheldon Summers, a California regulator, has pointed out that the APPM applies only to contracts dated Jan. 1, 2001, or later. Creating new VA guarantee reserve requirements by including them in the APPM could leave treatment of earlier contracts in question.
One possible answer, according to Bill Carmello, a New York regulator, would be to include a floor for reserves that would conform to the Standard Valuation Law.