Socially Conscious Funds Hold Their Own In The Face Of The Slump
“Socially conscious” money managers are hoping recent performance figures will ease the fear that mutual funds might need cigarettes, toxic waste and cheap gin to get through tough times.
Although the recent stock market slump has hit socially conscious managers favorite tech stocks hard, the 76 funds tracked by the Social Investment Forum, Washington, are doing about as well as comparable socially neutral funds.
What Your Peers Are Reading
The latest forum performance figures show that, as of July 30, 54% of the socially conscious funds were beating the S&P 500 stock index.
Socially conscious international and growth funds tended to lag several points behind the benchmarks for all funds in their categories, but many of the socially conscious balanced funds and fixed-income funds beat their benchmarks, according to forum figures.
Bridgeway Fund Inc., Houston, reached the top of the forum list with the Bridgeway Ultra-Small Company fund, a 7-year-old fund with only $52 million in assets.
The fund, which invests mainly in tiny, tobacco-free public companies with fewer than 200 employees, achieved 25.35% growth for the first seven months by backing companies like FTI Consulting Inc., Annapolis, Md., a consulting firm with a strong bankruptcy restructuring arm, according to Bridgeway.
Figures on asset flows are harder to find, but Pax World Management Corp., Portsmouth, N.H., the manager of the biggest, oldest fund on the Social Investment Forum list, the $1.2 billion-asset Pax World Balanced Fund, has been pleased with its investors attitude, according to Anita Green, Pax World social research director.
“We have not seen huge outflows from Pax,” Green says.
Greg Gorvan, president of Money with a Mission/FAFN Inc., Ithaca, N.Y., a fee-only advisory firm, warns against thinking of all socially conscious investors as investors with guts of steel.
“I dont know that theyre any better or any worse” than any other long-term fund investors, Gorvan says. “I dont think their risk tolerance is any different.”
But, in many cases, socially conscious investors seem to take drops in stride simply because they are long-term investors, according to Eric Packer, a registered principal in the Wellesley, Mass., office of Progressive Asset Management Inc., a unit of Financial West Group Inc., Westlake Village, Calif.
“Were not getting a lot of panicked calls,” Packer says.
“We find we get wonderful clients,” says Jack Brill, a registered investment advisor, Natural Investment Services Inc., Paonia, Colo., who has published Investing With Your Values, a guide to socially conscious investing. “They care about other people, they care about the earth. Its not the get-rich-quick guys.”
Socially conscious investing, which is also called “socially responsible investing,” “social screening” and “ethical investing,” has deep roots. Some money managers, church fund managers and pension fund sponsors have always applied social screens to investments.
But the modern socially conscious mutual fund industry began in 1972, when Pax World set up its fund to provide a fund option for investors who wanted to emphasize investments in companies they perceive as doing good things for the world and avoid investments in companies involved in weapons production, liquor, tobacco and gambling.
The boom in liberal socially conscious funds sparked a reactionary boom in the early 1980s in funds that intentionally sought out “sin stocks.” The last survivor of the sin fund class appears to be the $9.4 million-asset Morgan Funshares fund.
Some experts have speculated that a fund specializing in sin stocks would do unusually well in hard times, but the Morgan Funshares net asset value fell 5.5% during the first eight months of the year, according to Morningstar Inc., Chicago.
Meanwhile, total assets in all socially conscious, sin-avoiding funds tracked by Wiesenberger, Rockville, Md., have increased to $103 billion, from $150 million in 1971, according to a study commissioned by Pax World.
Many socially conscious fund managers continue to screen against tobacco, alcohol, weapons, environmental problems and labor abuses, but many are also encouraging investments in companies that fight pollution, lend to the poor, or make other active efforts to improve the world.