Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Jeremy Grantham, co-founder and chief investment strategist of GMO

Portfolio > Portfolio Construction > Investment Strategies

4 'Reasonable' Choices, If You Must Own U.S. Stocks: Grantham

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The AI bubble will at least deflate temporarily, Grantham predicted.
  • That will likely end the broader pandemic bubble, he said.
  • The investment strategist also expects an eventual U.S. recession.

Investment strategist Jeremy Grantham, who’s been urging investors to avoid U.S. stocks, sees danger in the “stark contrast” between market enthusiasm and major geopolitical risks.

He has nonetheless come up with some potential choices for those individuals or organizations, notably institutions, that must hold American equities.

The Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. co-founder suggested in a commentary Monday that the artificial intelligence “bubble” will likely at least deflate temporarily at some point, but acknowledged the AI bubble happening within an already existing market bubble is an “unprecedented” development with no direct historical analogy.

Grantham also anticipates an eventual recession.

The current U.S. market valuation, measured by the March 1 Shiller P/E  — an inflation-adjusted ratio found by dividing stock price by average earnings for the past decade — has hit the top 1% historically at 34, Grantham explained. Total profits are near record highs as well, he added, noting there’s never been a sustained U.S. market rally from a 34 Shiller P/E.

“Remember, if margins and multiples are both at record levels at the same time, it really is double counting and double jeopardy — for waiting somewhere in the future is another July 1982 or March 2009 with simultaneous record low multiples and badly depressed margins,” he warned.

Addressing the nature of AI and market bubbles, Grantham said the 2021 pandemic bubble appeared to be bursting conventionally the next year when ChatGPT entered the picture in late 2022.

AI, he wrote, “seems likely to be every bit as powerful and world-changing as the internet, and quite possibly much more so.”

Every technological revolution has come with early massive hype and a stock market bubble, and often becomes as transformative as imagined “but only after a substantial period of disappointment during which the initial bubble bursts,” Grantham noted.

“So it is likely to be with the current AI bubble. But a new bubble within a bubble like this, even one limited to a handful of stocks, is totally unprecedented, so looking at history books may have its limits,” he added.

Grantham expects “a more normal ending” to the original stock bubble when the AI bubble deflates, and called it likely that the interest rate-hike aftermath and “ridiculous” speculation in 2020-2021 and today “will eventually end in a recession.”

Grantham noted GMO has a soft spot for Japan, “where we are optimistic that they can continue their recent slow-but-steady improvements in their version of corporate capitalism” and expect the yen eventually to gain significantly against the dollar.

Non-U.S. stocks have more room to run than U.S. counterparts, with less risk when the bubble bursts, he wrote.

“The paradox that worries me here for the U.S. market is that we start from a Shiller P/E and corporate profit margins that are near record levels and therefore predicting near perfection, yet we face in reality not just a very risky disturbed geopolitical world, with growing concerns about democracy, equality, and capitalism, but also an unprecedented list of long-term negatives beginning to bite,” Grantham said.

“The stark contrast between apparent embedded enthusiasm and these likely problems seems extreme, illogical, and dangerous,” he explained.

Most institutions must own U.S. stocks, however, and “there is a reasonable choice of relatively attractive investments — relative, that is, to the broad U.S. market,” he wrote.

Grantham outlined several areas that investors seeking U.S. stocks might consider, especially for portfolio diversification.

1. Quality Stocks

U.S. quality stocks, with high stable return on equity and a pristine balance sheet, aren’t particularly cheap now, Grantham noted. Plus, they “have a long history of slightly underperforming in bull markets.

But they also have a long track record of “substantially outperforming in bear markets,” explained Grantham, adding that these stock did perform “unusually well in the recent run-up.”

“In addition, their long-term performance is remarkable. AAA bonds return about 1% a year less than low-grade bonds — everybody gets it, and always has. In bizarre contrast, the equivalent AAA stocks, with their lower bankruptcy risk, lower volatility, and just plain less risk, historically have delivered an extra 0.5% to 1.0% a year over the S&P 500,” Grantham noted.

“Even holding their own should be inconceivable. It is the greatest aberration of all time in the market, and one I’m happy to say we at GMO realized 45 years ago,” he added.

2. Natural Resource Stocks

“Not only are raw materials finite — believe it or not! — getting scarcer, and therefore certain to rise in price, but at longer horizons, 10 years, resources are the only sector of the stock market to be negatively correlated with the broad stock market.,” Grantham said.

“They are far and away the most diversifying sector. … They are also particularly cheap today, having been whacked recently,” he noted.

3. Climate-Focused Equities

As climate damage grows and givernments become more willing to take action, Grantham wrote, “I believe climate investments will have top-line revenue growth that is guaranteed to be above average for the next many decades, although with no guarantees as to the smoothness of that growth.”

With solar and wind costs more up front than operational, “climate investments are exceptionally discount rate-sensitive, which has hammered them over the past two and a half years. And in its usual way, the market has overreacted to the trend of rising rates, making these investments real bargains today,” Grantham said.

“Today, solar stocks are priced at over a 50% discount to the broad equity market, and some of the best clean energy companies in the world trade at levels that imply negative real growth.”

4. Deep Value Holdings

Deep value stocks, with low valuations compared with their inherent worth, “look cheap enough to be worth some investment, as the comparison with the total market is about as wide as it ever gets,” Grantham wrote.

 Photo: Bloomberg


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.