Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
UBS building in Europe

Regulation and Compliance > Litigation

Ex-UBS Advisor Says Firm Fired Him Over His Depression

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

A former UBS advisor has sued the wirehouse, alleging it violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act by “failing to reasonably accommodate” his treatment for depression.

In a complaint filed Friday at U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Timothy Joseph Trott said he left Merrill Lynch after seven years to join the wirehouse in December 2008, working out of a branch office of the firm in Erie, Pennsylvania, as a financial advisor.

Trott received a recruiting bonus of $454,670 that, in common industry practice, was secured by a promissory note to be forgiven if he remained with UBS through Jan. 2, 2018, according to the complaint.

In April 2015, Trott started to experience major depressive disorder and anxiety that affected his ability to work effectively. As a result, he took a two-week leave of absence from the wirehouse, according to the complaint.

Trott then returned to work but took a medical leave for the second time shortly after that, in June 2015, when he was committed to a mental health facility, the complaint stated. Trott was placed on unpaid medical leave by the wirehouse and told he would have to obtain medical clearance before being allowed to return to work.

In April 2016, Trott improved enough for his psychiatrist to approve a 15- to 20-hour weekly return-to-work plan that would be reevaluated after the advisor worked a few weeks, according to the complaint.

Trott provided his doctor’s suggested part-time work plan to UBS but the company did not provide a response and ignored his inquiries about it for almost a year, the complaint alleged.

On July 14, 2017, Trott received a letter from Stephanie Basham from the UBS human resources office, dated June 28, 2017, informing him he was terminated effective as of that date, because of the response to a May 12, 2017, letter that advised Trott he was not yet able to work. according to the complaint.

“None of this made any sense, as Mr. Trott was never sent any letter or email dated May 12, 2017, nor had he or his physicians ever advised that he was not currently able to work,” the complaint stated.

On top of losing his job and the opportunity to earn commissions from it, Trott also became required to repay the loan that UBS gave him as part of his initial employee compensation package when he was hired because he didn’t remain with the wirehouse through Jan. 2, 2018, according to the complaint.

Trott filed a charge of discrimination against UBS with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission on Oct. 3, 2017.

On Feb. 15, 2018, UBS, through its legal counsel, filed a position statement with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, denying Trott’s claims had any merit because UBS made “multiple extensions of Mr. Trott’s unpaid leave as an accommodation in each instance his leave expired.”

After Trott sought additional leave in June 2017, UBS decided further job-protected leave wasn’t reasonable because Trott allegedly confirmed to the firm he had no anticipated return to work date, according to the complaint.

Financial Advisor IQ reported on the complaint Monday morning.

Photo: Shutterstock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.