Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
J. Mark Iwry. (Photo: Brookings)

Life Health > Annuities > Fixed Annuities

How Secure 2.0 Will Come Alive: Insights From a Treasury Veteran

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

J.Mark Iwry has played a major role in designing the laws and regulations that shape your clients’ retirement finances.

Today, he’s getting extra attention because of his decades of experience with programs expanded by the new Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act, or Secure 2.0, which came to life in December.

Iwry is a former senior advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury. He now serves as a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and as a visiting scholar at the Wharton School.

He started out by attending Harvard, where he earned a bachelor’s degree, a law degree, and a master’s degree in public policy.

From 1992 through 2001, and then from 2009 through 2017, he served as an official at the U.S. Treasury Department, which is the parent of the Internal Revenue Service.

In the Obama-Biden administration, he served as senior advisor to the secretary of the Treasury and deputy assistant secretary for retirement and health policy, overseeing the regulation of the private pension system and playing a big role in the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

Iwry also has practiced law, as a partner at Covington & Burling and later as of counsel to Sullivan & Cromwell. He has been a research professor at Georgetown University, an adjunct faculty member at  George Washington University law school, and a senior advisor to AARP, in addition to holding his positions at Brookings and Wharton.

While at Treasury, he led Executive Branch efforts to put together frameworks for new types of benefit arrangements, to expand retirement plan coverage and economic security, especially for lower-income workers, racial minorities, and women.

In 1998 he developed and led Treasury’s initiative to define, approve, and promote automatic (“opt-out”) enrollment in 401(k) plans, together with other automatic features.  He also developed or co-authored the saver’s tax credit, which is used by about 10 million savers; the SIMPLE-IRA plan, which is used by about 3 million savers; the startup tax credit for small businesses that adopt a retirement plan; and provisions that promote pension portability, such as mechanisms that support automatic rollovers from employer plans.

Another provision Iwry helped create, the “qualified longevity annuity contract,” was part of an Iwry initiative to “put the pension back in the private pension system.”

The QLAC is a deferred income annuity that’s designed to provide affordable longevity protection for retirement savers with 401(k) plan, 403(b) plan or IRA assets, by starting a lifetime stream of benefits payments only when a saver reaches a specified trigger age, such as 80 or 85. QLACs can be provided on a joint and survivor basis to protect both spouses for life, or can include a feature for repaying the premium when the purchaser dies at a younger age.

Many Secure 2.0 provisions expand provisions and programs that Iwry helped set up, and Iwry helped design and draft a number of the Secure 2.0 provisions.

Secure 2.0 section 202, for example, will increase the amount an IRA holder or 401(k) plan participant can contribute to a QLAC to $200,000, from what was originally $125,000.

Iwry answered questions via email about the teams from Treasury, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration and other federal agencies that will bring the QLAC changes and other Secure 2.0 provisions to life.

The interview has been condensed and edited.

THINKADVISOR: Roughly how many Treasury and IRS people might be involved with writing Secure 2.0 regulations, and roughly how many EBSA people? Thousands? Hundreds?

MARK IWRY: Nothing like thousands or hundreds. Numbers like those apply to the people in the field — doing investigations and audits, enforcement, administration, reviewing and approving applications, processing tax returns and refunds, etc.

As for how many people are writing the regulations for EBSA and IRS, you’d think perhaps the number of people might increase over the years, as the law is becoming more complex all the time and the development of high-quality regulations is labor-intensive. But actually, the number of people engaged in writing regulations always seems to be the same: namely, half as many people as they feel are needed.

I’d guess it’s probably close to a dozen, or maybe a few more working on EBSA regulations, and maybe a couple dozen working on regulations at IRS and Treasury.

How do the agencies interact?

Jurisdiction over retirement policy is split between the Labor Department and the Treasury/IRS, reflecting the jurisdictional divide between the congressional labor committees and tax-writing committees. Many of the rules are actually repeated verbatim in both the tax code and the labor laws (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act).

So one day in the mid-1970s, the two top officials in charge of retirement at the two agencies met for lunch and agreed on how to allocate and coordinate responsibilities — memorialized on a paper napkin.

Congress later codified the napkin treaty in legislation that allocates between the Treasury and Labor Departments the authority to interpret and administer each of the pertinent legislative provisions.

On the tax side, people often confusingly refer to the IRS and Treasury separately. But the IRS is part of Treasury. Can you sort that out for us?

Yes, the IRS is an agency that is part of the Treasury Department — in fact, its single largest component.

References to “Treasury” (as distinct from IRS) generally refer to another component of the Treasury Department: the Office of Tax Policy, which works hand-in-glove with the IRS in interpreting and implementing the tax code by co-authoring regulations and other guidance.

The Office of Tax Policy, in turn, includes an Office of the Benefits Tax Counsel — six or seven lawyers and a pension actuary — that is responsible for the tax aspects of pensions, retirement savings, health care and other employee benefits.

When it comes to developing regulations interpreting retirement legislation like Secure 2.0, this small but very expert Benefits Tax Counsel group at Treasury teams up with highly skilled IRS lawyers who specialize in employee plans and employee benefits.

What happens if the IRS and Treasury groups disagree?

They work it out.

It’s less than a 10-minute walk between the Treasury building (next door to the White House) and the IRS headquarters on Constitution Avenue. The Treasury people shuttle between the two buildings all the time.

Ultimately, the IRS decides how the tax laws, including those relating to retirement, are administered and how they apply to particular firms or individual taxpayers.

But tax regulations are a joint Treasury-IRS work product, with Treasury having the final say on policy in the tax area, including what policy positions regulations will take when interpreting and implementing retirement tax legislation.

Treasury and IRS staffs work the regulations in a totally collaborative way, and traditionally the relationships have been close and congenial.

When a 350-page law like this with 92 different sections is dropped in their lap, how do the regulators deal with it?

First, recall that both EBSA and Treasury/IRS, over time, have given congressional staff several sets of technical comments on drafts of the legislation. So they’re thoroughly familiar with most of it before it’s enacted.

When enactment is imminent, the regulation writers review the final legislative text — especially any late-breaking changes — with a fine-tooth comb.

They compile a list of the regulations or other guidance projects they think will be needed, along with the effective dates and any congressionally imposed regulation deadlines.

Then, looking at their staffing resources — taking into account staff’s experience, expertise, interests, availability, workload — and the expected approval process and pipeline, the leaders of the relevant Treasury and IRS offices hold a series of meetings to jointly put together an IRS-Treasury team or working group for each regulation project.

And they formulate an overall work plan for the projects as a group.

Is this all done together among Treasury/IRS and EBSA as a single work plan, or do they have two separate, parallel processes?

The latter; Treasury/IRS collaborate in developing their joint work plan, and EBSA develops its own separate work plan, but the two communicate and coordinate where necessary or helpful.

Congress assigned some Secure 2.0 projects to both departments jointly — or to one in consultation with the other — so, of course, they work together on those.

And each department often has a chance to review and comment on or clear a draft of the other department’s retirement regulations or other guidance before it can be issued.

This can happen before or while the draft regulation is submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for final review before publication.  OMB can raise questions and concerns about the regulation, and also has procedures whereby it sometimes gives outside stakeholders an opportunity to provide comments to OMB on the draft regulation before OMB signs off.

How do the regulators set priorities?

The regulators solicit input — written and sometimes oral — from industry and other stakeholder groups to suggest priorities and approaches for agency interpretation and implementation of new legislation like Secure 2.0.

The initial focus is,“What do plan sponsors, recordkeepers, asset managers, other plan advisors and financial or administrative service providers view as the most time-sensitive and important issues to resolve?”

When the IRS asks for comments on proposed financial services regulations, what percentage of the comments are useful?

Generally, in my experience, all of the comments on proposed regulations or other guidance — and on priorities for implementing new legislation like Secure 2.0 — are useful.

The regulators want to hear all points of view and all implications so they can make decisions that are as well-informed and responsible as possible.

All written comments are read and considered carefully, and staff prepare summaries of the comments for officials up the chain who don’t have time to read all of the comments in full.

What kinds of comments do IRS regulations get too much of, and what kind (if any) do they get too little of?

The only kind of regulation comments I can think of that IRS and Treasury often get too little of are comments representing the interests of individuals — consumers, investors, workers and plan participants.

Individuals’ comments tend to be far outnumbered by industry comments.

And most of the workers’ rights groups lack the kind of resources that enable industry stakeholders to follow and comment on all of the relevant regulations and other guidance.

What is the process after comments are reviewed?

Briefly stated, the attorneys in the working group responsible for developing each regulation (sometimes called the “small group”) thoroughly discuss the issues, try to reach a consensus on proposed resolutions of all relevant issues and questions, and prepare a draft regulation.

They also prepare memoranda for the senior reviewers and decision makers (sometimes referred to as the “large group”) explaining the issues, including the major arguments and points of view, and describing their recommendations and the rationale for each recommendation.

The large group reviews the memos and draft regulation and meets to discuss and hammer out decisions on the outstanding issues.

The regulation is then revised and — after a further approval process and clearance by the most senior relevant Treasury and IRS officials, and by OMB — is published.

Having worked on scores of regulations during my 17 years at Treasury, I can attest that the process is thorough and professional.

J. Mark Iwry. (Photo: Brookings Institution)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.