Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Water tap dripping dollar bills

Life Health > Annuities

Who Benefits Most From Annuity Purchases?

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • A new analysis concludes that access to well-designed variable deferred annuities with some equity exposure can enhance retiree well-being.
  • The welfare enhancement from optimized utilization of annuities and Social Security claiming range between $25,000 and $50,000.
  • There are importance demographic caveats at play in the analysis, especially with respect to income and education levels.

A new paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research investigates retirees’ optimal purchases of fixed and variable longevity income annuities using their defined contribution plan assets and given their expected Social Security benefits.

The underlying analysis was put together by a trio of authors including Vanya Horneff and Raimond Maurer of the Goethe University Frankfurt, and Olivia Mitchell of the University of Pennsylvania.

According to Horneff, Maurer and Mitchell, the inclusion of deferred income annuities in DC accounts is welfare-enhancing for all demographic groups examined. They also conclude that providing access to well-designed variable deferred annuities with some equity exposure further enhances retiree well-being, compared to having access only to fixed annuities.

Overall, according to the analysis, a retiree who receives a substantial portion of their income through Social Security should consider deploying a significant portion of the remainder of their financial portfolio to risky equities, whether through mutual funds or via annuities whose payments are linked at least in part to the performance of an equity portfolio.

Notably, the authors suggest this conclusion must be squared with the practical and behavioral realities of retirement planning. In particular, those who are least educated (high-school dropouts, as defined by the analysts) — and thus less likely to be informed about the markets and more likely to make tactical investing mistakes — are probably best off delaying claiming Social Security as the primary means of improving their retirement outlook.

This is also true because the lowest earners tend to have more of their income replaced by Social Security, making the claiming decision a more powerful wealth-enhancement lever compared with deferred annuity purchases.

On the other hand, the most educated (defined by the trio as having at least some college experience) benefit more from using approaches that involve leveraging DC plan assets to purchase deferred annuities. This result is tied to their greater life expectancies, as well as the fact that Social Security payments represent a smaller proportion of their anticipated lifetime wealth.

Running the Analysis

As the authors explain it, the main goal of the new paper is to examine how two key retirement income sources — annuities and Social Security benefits — should be considered jointly to optimize household welfare.

“Understanding how these interact is of key importance in order to generate efficient retirement portfolios,” the authors write.

According to Horneff, Maurer and Mitchell, such an analysis is also important because there is likely to be “substantial heterogeneity” in the demand for longevity annuities across the retiree population.

Put another way, any given individual’s preferences and needs will depend on their assets inside and outside their tax-qualified retirement plans, as well as on their mortality assumptions, their accrued Social Security benefits, and their anticipated longevity given their own unique health history.

The authors’ approach to addressing this question is to embed annuity purchases and claiming decisions in a full life cycle model, which starts at age 25 and runs to age 100. As the authors explain, the model seeks to analyze optimal saving and investing across bonds and risky stocks with respect to individuals’ choices about consumption and their withdrawal patterns for assets inside and outside the DC plan.

“Our model also includes heterogeneity in lifetime earnings, assets and mortality across education groups, and importantly, we incorporate important institutional aspects including the progressive and complex U.S. income tax code and Social Security benefits formula,” the authors say.

The authors take further pains to investigate optimal annuitization ratios for both fixed as well as variable annuities and alternative deferral ages. Additionally, they seek to “realistically calibrate” their model’s parameters, using a matching procedure to select preference parameters so that the model results match the empirically observable assets invested by U.S. workers in tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plans as closely as possible.

Finally, they use the model to analyze the demand for, and welfare consequences of, four alternative approaches. Specifically, they examine the results of claiming Social Security at age 66 versus 67 (without access to deferred income annuities) and of claiming Social Security at age 66 with access to fixed or variable DIAs.

Drawing Conclusions, and What it Means for Advisors

According to the authors, the results of this intricate analysis show that using retirement account assets to purchase at least some fixed deferred income annuities benefits all demographic groups examined. They further find that allowing payout annuities to have a small exposure to equity can additionally enhance welfare.

Nevertheless, for the least educated, delaying claiming Social Security benefits is preferred, according to the authors. There are a variety of reasons for this, including the fact that the least educated tend to be the lowest earners, and thus optimized Social Security claiming decisions will simply have a greater impact on their overall lifetime wealth. Another consideration is the relative simplicity of delayed Social Security claiming in comparison to other strategies that involve carefully timed taxable distributions and annuity purchases.

“Lower educated retirees … fare much better if they delay claiming and use retirement assets to bridge their consumption needs, versus buying DIAs,” the authors suggest. “This is because the least educated have a higher Social Security replacement rate and a higher mortality risk, whereas the better educated receive relatively lower Social Security benefits and can anticipate longer lifetimes.”

According to the report authors, the welfare gains available from optimized utilization of annuities and careful Social Security claiming typically range between $25,000 and $50,000.

One important caveat in the report is that current regulatory policy stipulates that variable annuities are disallowed as qualified longevity annuity contracts within U.S. retirement plans. The authors suggest that this policy may warrant reconsideration, as their results show well-designed and affordably priced variable deferred income annuities in retirement plan portfolios can markedly enhance retiree financial well-being.

(Image: Adobe Stock)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.