Close Close
ThinkAdvisor

Retirement Planning > Spending in Retirement

10 Things Advisors Should Know About Sequence of Returns Risk in Retirement

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Sequence of returns risk is often overlooked as a significant risk to a retirement plan even though it is among the largest risks that older investors face, Morgan Stanley Wealth Management points out in a new report, “Retirement Income and Sequence of Returns Risk.”

Sequence of returns risk refers to the possibility that low returns early in an investor’s retirement can deplete his or her portfolio just as they start spending their nest egg. When this happens, the portfolio takes a hit from declining asset value, especially if the market is in a downturn, as well as from withdrawals.

Advisors should all be aware of this issue and factor it into the retirement plans of their clients, who often aren’t even aware of what sequence of returns risk is.

Fortunately, however, there are several ways to mitigate the problem, according to the Morgan Stanley report.

Here are 10 top takeaways of interest to advisors and investors from the report:

1. It is crucial to have a well-designed and faithfully implemented retirement income strategy.

A diversified portfolio, regular saving, careful planning and not overtrading are the “key pillars” of a successful strategy, according to the report.

Faithfully sticking to that plan is crucial because these best practices “mitigate several important risks to a retirement plan, according to Morgan Stanley.

2. Even with a good plan, advisors and investors still must address sequence of returns risk.

Even investors with a strong retirement strategy who stick faithfully to that plan could be affected by sequence of returns risk, the report says, noting it has “often been neglected as a source of risk” in retirement and provides “considerable potential to upset the applecart.”

3. Advisors have all too often not done a good job helping investors minimize sequence of returns risk.

Although diversification, planning and monitoring are “accepted tenets of industry advice, the industry historically hasn’t done as good a job helping investors minimize sequence of returns risk,” according to Morgan Stanley.

4. A good example of that mistake is the way in which target date funds handle strategy in the retirement phase.

“One of the better examples of that shortcoming is the way that so-called target date funds, which are products asset managers create to help investors accumulate and distribute retirement savings, handle strategy in the retirement phase,” according to the report.

Target date funds are multi-asset class products whose asset allocation changes during an investor’s lifetime, mainly by reducing the allocation to equities as the investor ages, a feature known as its asset allocation glidepath, as Morgan Stanley explains.

“Although different managers of such funds have approached asset allocation differently, many of the most popular fund series recommend a declining equity allocation during retirement,” the report says.

That, however, “can actually worsen sequence of returns risk using the recent experience of the unfavorable sequence of returns suffered by investors who retired in the year 2000, just before a difficult decade for markets that included the global financial crisis,” Morgan Stanley notes.

5. Investors will be facing this issue at an especially bad time.

Investors who are left open to sequence of returns risk are left wide open to facing “financial duress at a time in their life when duress can be very unforgiving to manage,” according to Morgan Stanley.

6. Buying more stocks isn’t the only option.

There are fortunately “ways to mitigate sequence of returns risk that gel better with investor preferences than recommending higher and higher allocations to equities as retirees age,” the report says.

7. “The key to defusing sequence of returns risk is extending the effective investment horizon.”

“The longer investors give the market time to average out, the more likely they are to get average results, which historically is a winning formula for achieving financial goals,” according to Morgan Stanley.

“When it comes to the retirement phase, that means something approximating the opposite of the popular recommendation of a declining equity allocation, namely one that increases portfolio risk over time,” the report says.

“This of course is a challenge for advisors because investors tend to become more, not less, averse to risk as they age, and tend to want less, not more, risky strategies as they get deeper into retirement,” Morgan Stanley points out.

That “helps to explain why the industry hasn’t historically done a good job of helping clients mitigate sequence of returns risk”: It is because the most obvious approaches to doing so “fly in the face of common investor preferences.”

8. One key way to mitigate the risk is allocating a portion of the portfolio to annuities with lifetime income benefits.

The first good option to mitigate risk is via the use of annuities, especially those that pay a guaranteed regular income benefit to retirees while they’re alive, Morgan Stanley says.

Annuities have, of course, been around for a long time. But their potential usefulness tends to get “overlooked, especially in our era as the demise of traditional pension funds has left many Americans with only the minimal guaranteed retirement income baseline of Social Security,” the report notes.

“There are many different types of annuities and many different ways to incorporate them into a retirement strategy, ranging from partial to full annuitization across different sources of funds, tax treatments, death benefits, and more,” Morgan Stanley points out.

In the report, the firm highlights how a “simple strategy of partial annuitization of a portfolio can substantially mitigate sequence of returns risk, specifically by permitting both a smaller initial equity allocation and a longer effective holding period for it to grow.”

9. One more option: more sophisticated retirement income strategies including ‘time-segmented bucketing.’

In time-segmented bucketing, portfolio funds are “split into separate pools of assets which are aligned to different phases of retirement,” the report explains.

The pools aligned with short-term retirement expenses are invested conservatively, while asset pools aligned against retirement expenses decades into the future and any assets for gifting are invested aggressively, Morgan Stanley explains.

“As a retiree passes through those phases, they draw on the asset pool aligned against it,” the report says. “In this way, time-segmented bucketing traces out an increasing risk profile that begins conservatively without alarming investors whose near-term retirement needs are not exposed to market volatility.”

A “declining equity approach could be expected to similarly outperform a time-segmented bucketing approach in a return sequence where more favorable returns happened earlier in the period; however, those are generally not periods where either strategy will tend to fail,” it adds.

10. Not so fast. There is a big drawback to time-segmented bucketing.

However, Morgan Stanley warns that the “principal drawback of time-segmented bucketing is that it can be difficult to implement from a logistical perspective given the complexity of setting up multiple asset pools within existing account structures.”

(Image Above: Adobe Stock)