Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Life Insurance

5 Spending Bill 'Pay Fors' That Could Affect Your World

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The House approved the giant Build Back Better social spending package by a 220-213 vote.
  • CBO analysts say pay-for provisions could generate $1.3 trillion in extra revenue over 10 years.
  • Whatever happens to H.R. 5376, memories of that $1.3 trillion revenue increase total could linger.

Analysts at the Congressional Budget Office have cast their vote on H.R. 5376 — the 2,135-page Build Back Better social spending bill.

CBO analysts predicted Thursday that H.R. 5376 will increase federal spending about $1.6 trillion over the 10-year period from 2022 through 2031, and increase federal revenue by $1.3 trillion over that period.

The U.S. government spends about $4.2 trillion per year. H.R. 5376 could increase spending by an average of 2.2% per year and revenue by an average of 3% per year.

The pay-fors come on top of bill provisions that could reduce federal spending by, for example, letting Medicare program managers negotiate lower prices with prescription drug manufacturers.

Pay-For Memories

H.R. 5376 passed Friday by a narrow, 220-213 vote in the House. All Republicans who participated voted against the bill, and all Democrats but one voted for it. Rep. Jared Golden, D-Maine, was the only Democrat who crossed party lines to vote against it.

The prospects of the bill in the Senate are unclear. Even if the bill fails, lawmakers could remember the CBO’s pay-for revenue estimates when looking for ideas about how to pay for future efforts to expand federal programs or cut federal taxes.

Some of the provisions that would have a big effect on insurers that write life insurance, annuities or health insurance would target the finances of affluent clients.

Other pay-fors would raise the taxes of all companies and affect insurers indirectly. Insurers account for more than 10% of U.S. gross domestic product, and it seems likely that insurers could be on the hook for more than 10% of the revenue coming from general corporate tax increases.

In some cases, the pay-fors could help financial services companies by increasing demand for insurance-based arrangements that can help customers manage federal tax obligations.

The CBO Scores

Here’s a look at how CBO “scored” the 10-year revenue impact of five of the H.R. 5376 pay-fors of interest to insurance professionals.

Requiring all companies to pay a minimum level of income tax through a corporate alternative minimum tax provision (Section 138101): $319 billion.

Imposing a surcharge on high-income individuals, estates and trusts (Section 138203): $228 billion.

Imposing an excise tax on companies that buy back shares of their own stock (Section 138101): $144 billion.

New tax rules for companies that turn divisions into separate companies by giving shares of their own stock to their shareholders (Section 138143): $67 billion.

Changes in the tax rules for rollovers to Roth IRAs and accounts (Section 138311): $2.7 billion.

(Image: Adobe)


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.