Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley is optimistic about the near-term economic outlook and the likelihood that the Federal Open Market Committee will be able to make progress this year in pushing inflation up toward its 2% objective.
Dudley’s outlook for 2018 and the near term is “reasonably bright,” he said during a speech at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association’s conference on the U.S. economic outlook for 2018 in New York. (Dudley intends to retire form the New York Fed by the middle of this year.)
So, if 2018 looks good, what about the longer term?
“The economy has considerable forward momentum, monetary policy is still accommodative, financial conditions are easy, and fiscal policy is set to provide a boost,” Dudley said. “But there are some significant storm clouds over the longer term.”
In his speech, Dudley discussed two things that he’s not worried about and three things that have him concerned.
Not worried that the economic expansion is in its ninth year.
Dudley said that he does not think the economic expansion is vulnerable just because it is “old.”
“As we like to say, expansions don’t die of old age — they die either because monetary policy needs to be tightened appreciably to combat rising inflation, or because the economy gets hit with a large shock that overwhelms the ability of the Federal Reserve and other policymakers to stabilize it successfully,” he said. “In general, with inflation below the FOMC’s long-run objective, we can be cautious in how we adjust monetary policy.”
Not worried about the recent flattening of the Treasury yield curve.
At the end of 2017, the spread between the 10-year Treasury bond and 2-year Treasury note had narrowed to 52 basis points, from 125 basis points at the start of the year.
While some commentators believe that such a flattening foreshadows a recession, Dudley said that he was not concerned about the recent flattening of the Treasury yield curve.
According to Dudley, “some flattening in the yield curve should be expected as we gradually remove monetary policy accommodation.”
He also notes that it should be expected that the yield curve be flatter than normal in the current environment.
“Not only are bond term premia depressed due to quantitative easing both here and abroad, but the low inflation environment is also likely a contributing factor,” Dudley said.
Slightly worried about financial market asset valuations.
One area that Dudley said he’s “slightly — but not particularly — worried about” is financial market asset valuations, which he says are “elevated.”
“While valuations are noteworthy, I am less concerned than I might be otherwise because the economy’s performance and outlook seem consistent with what we see in financial markets,” he said.
According to Dudley, the financial system today is “much more resilient and robust” than it was a decade ago.
“Even if financial asset prices were to decline significantly — which presumably would occur if the economic outlook were to deteriorate — I don’t think such declines would have the destructive impact we saw a decade ago,” he said.
Worried about the risk of economic overheating.
According to Dudley, “economic overheating” could be a real risk over the next few years.
“Not only do we have an economy that is growing at an above-trend pace — at a time when the labor market is already quite tight—but the economy will be getting an extra boost in 2018 and 2019 from the recently enacted tax legislation,” he said.
According to Dudley, this suggests that the Federal Reserve may have to press harder on the brakes at some point over the next few years. And, if that happens, Dudley says the risk of a hard landing will increase.
“Historically, the Federal Reserve has found it difficult to achieve a soft landing — especially when the unemployment rate has fallen below the rate consistent with stable inflation,” he said.
Worried about the long-term fiscal position of the United States.
According to Dudley, the current U.S. fiscal position is far worse than it was at the end of the last business cycle.
Dudley’s example: “In fiscal year 2007, the budget deficit was 1.1% of GDP; in fiscal 2017, it was 3.5% of GDP. Similarly, federal debt held by the public was 35% of GDP in fiscal 2007, and 77% in fiscal 2017.”
He also explained that there are three factors that will “undoubtedly” cause these budgetary pressures to intensify over time: “the tax legislation will push up the federal deficit and federal debt burden; debt service costs will rise as interest rates normalize; and entitlement outlays will increase as the baby boom generation retires.”
— Related on ThinkAdvisor: