President Donald Trump signed the new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act into existence on Friday and put the legislative analysts of the world on notice: They now have to find out exactly what’s in the TCJA.

The Republican effort to draft, debate and amend the package was so complicated, and so full of suspense, that observers tended to focus more on who might be voting for or against the package than on the package contents.

Trade groups, rating agencies, accounting firms and law firms are just starting to post detailed analyses of the provisions that might affect U.S. issuers of life insurance and annuities.

(Related: New Tax Act Could Boost Life Settlement Market)

Ryan Krueger, a securities analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc., and Sean Dargan, an analyst at Wells Fargo, are examples of industry watchers who are trying to push the analytical process a step further and speculate about how specific TCJA provisions might affect specific companies.

Here’s a look at five of Krueger and Dargan’s ideas about the effects of TCJA provisions on annuity issuers, drawn from two of their recent research reports.

1.  The issuers’ finances will look different.

Dargan’s team at Wells Fargo predicts that many issuers will end up with lower capitalization levels, because the TCJA will reduce life insurers’ ability to deduct reserves from taxable income. 

Magnifying glass (Image: Thinkstock)

(Image: Thinkstock)

The TJCA should also reduce typical issuers’ overall tax bills.

“It seems to us that lower taxes are a net benefit to the industry,” the Wells Fargo team writes.

The Walls Fargo team predicts that the rating agencies and state insurance regulators will adjust their risk-based capital rules and formulas to reflect the new tax rules.

2. The issuers’ profits could be a lot higher.

Krueger estimates average life insurance effective tax rates will fall to 19%, from 21%.

3. Issuers that avoided getting into big trouble during the Great Recession era could do even better than the others.

Some life insurers have large “deferred tax assets,” or the ability to take huge, stored-up tax deductions, because of giant losses they suffered in 2009 and 2010.

By reducing corporate tax rates, the TCJA will reduce the value of those deferred tax assets.

Krueger cites American Equity Investment Life Holding as an example of the kind of the annuity issuer that could benefit from all of the TCJA tax cuts without having to write down the value of its capacity to take tax deductions.

4. Issuers could be a little tighter with cash.

The TCJA includes complicated tax rules that affect accounting for “deferred acquisition costs,” or the expenses associated with acquiring new life and annuity customers.

The new rules should have no effect on life insurers’ overall tax payments, in the long run, but the rules could make issuers pay some taxes sooner, Krueger writes.

The change could make cash flow generation “modestly worse over the intermediate term” at some large annuity issuers, Krueger writes.

5. Consumers could get better deals.

Krueger predicts that insurers will pass at least some of their tax savings on to customers through new business pricing. “Competitive pressures and growth will likely drive this over time,” he writes.

—Read Keefe, Bruyette to Seek Buyer for Scottish Annuity & Life on ThinkAdvisor.


— Connect with ThinkAdvisor Life/Health on
Facebook and Twitter.