Risky vs. safe.
How often do you break down that concept with your clients regarding their financial asset allocation? Determining what portion of a client’s finances should be used for “risky” investments to maximize growth potential and “safe” options to ensure preservation of capital is one of the first — and most important — conversations a client and broker will have.
For the risky portion, it is typical for brokers and advisors to recommend stocks. For the safe allocation, many typical recommendations include money market accounts, CDs or, perhaps the most common choice, bond mutual funds.
However, for many clients, there is a lesser-known but more reliable alternative than bond funds: a fixed annuity. Why is it better? A fixed annuity can provide clients with a similar rate of return to a bond mutual fund, with greater safety.
The importance of choosing a safe route
Brokers and advisors typically recommend clients place a portion of their money in assets geared to ensure protection of principal. As clients get older, they often place a higher portion of their assets into nonstock vehicles that offer increased safety to help ensure that they stay on track for a secure retirement. Bond mutual funds are a common asset for brokers and advisors to recommend as a safe option, with most funds offering a low single-digit current yield.
However, many clients don’t realize that a bond mutual fund can be risky to buy when interest rates are low. If interest rates go up, the value of your client’s bond mutual fund holdings may decrease substantially — the exact opposite of what your clients expected when they were looking to find a safe place for their money.
How fixed annuities outperform a bond mutual fund
While an apples-to-apples comparison isn’t exactly possible, there are a few key ways in which a fixed annuity differs from a bond mutual fund: