Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Health Insurance

Trump says GOP must pass AHCA or risk losing seats

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

(Bloomberg) — Donald Trump warned House Republicans in a closed-door meeting Tuesday that many of them could lose their seats in the 2018 elections if they don’t pass H.R. 1628, the Affordable Care Act overhaul bill.

The president’s warning came a day after GOP leaders made several changes to their measure aimed at wooing reluctant Republicans, including limits to Medicaid enrollment and an accelerated phaseout of some taxes.

Related: Freedom Caucus keeps heat on would-be ACA changers

“Support it!” Trump told lawmakers, according to Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina, who said he still opposes the measure. He said Trump’s remarks contained “nothing in detail, except politically it’s the right thing to do.”

Asked on his way into a closed-door GOP meeting whether they had the votes, Trump said, “I think so.”

But House conservatives said late Monday that they didn’t get the changes they were looking for and could block passage.

“Currently there are not enough votes to pass the legislation,” House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows said Monday night after a raucous caucus meeting. The group, which has opposed earlier versions, didn’t take an official position on the changes, but a spokeswoman said a whip count by the group showed it could defeat the bill.

And conservative Republican Mo Brooks of Alabama said he wasn’t impressed by Trump’s election threat.

“I think if we do vote for this we will lose the majority,” Brooks said after the meeting.

The alterations are being proposed to help add Republican support for the bill, which is set to come up for a vote on the House floor Thursday, and House leaders sounded an optimistic note about the chance for passage. The changes would allow states to require people covered by Medicaid to work and block U.S. funds for any new efforts to expand the health program for the poor.

While it softens some measures that would make health coverage more expensive for older people, H.R. 1628 remains a threat to hospitals and some insurers, which would see fewer paying patients if it passed.

‘One step closer’

House leaders praised the changes Monday night, with Speaker Paul Ryan saying Republicans were “one step closer” to repealing Obamacare.

“I want to thank the White House and members from all parts of our conference who have helped make this the strongest legislation it can be,” he said in a statement late Monday.

One indication that Ryan and his lieutenants are gaining important ground came late Monday when Rep. Tom MacArthur of New Jersey and several other moderates said they would back the bill.

MacArthur co-chairs a group of House centrists known as the “Tuesday Group.” He was joined in his announcement by Reps. Tom McClintock of California, Martha McSally of Arizona and Robert Aderholt of Alabama. In a statement, the group pointed to adjustments to boost the bill’s tax credits for lower-income adults as key in helping to address their concerns.

Not all House moderates had yet joined in support by Tuesday morning, including MacArthur’s Tuesday Group co-chairman — Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania. But securing centrist backing is key for GOP vote counters, who have little wiggle room given ongoing opposition from some conservatives.

But members had different opinions on whether the changes would be enough to get it through.

“I think there are obviously some small tweaks that are good tweaks but there’s no substantial changes in the manager’s amendment that would make anybody be more compelled to vote for this,” Meadows said.

Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., said the H.R. 1628 vote will be a "defining moment for the Freedom Caucus." (Photo: Amash)

Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., said the H.R. 1628 vote will be a “defining moment for the Freedom Caucus.” (Photo: Amash)

‘Defining moment’

“This is a defining moment for the Freedom Caucus,” he added. “I don’t think there is a more critical vote for the Freedom Caucus than this particular one.”

Another Freedom Caucus member, Justin Amash of Michigan, said he’s confident the group will largely hold together to block the bill after leaders ignored their demands.

“We’ve made suggestions all the way through,” he said Monday night. “If they don’t want to listen to them then that’s on them.”

Rep. Phil Roe, a member of the Republican vote-counting team, said Trump’s visit may help “any wavering souls.”

“It’s gonna be a close vote I think, but I think it’s going to pass,” said Roe.

House leaders were working hard to to win over remaining holdouts, both conservatives and moderates in their party, a process known as whipping votes.

‘A whip that’s 10 feet long’

“They’re already whipping with a whip that’s 10 feet long and five feet wide,” Meadows said when asked if GOP leaders were trying to pick off individual members of the Freedom Caucus.

An outcry followed the introduction of the GOP bill, which would cut assistance for people buying insurance, roll back the Medicaid program for the poor and lead 24 million more Americans to be uninsured in 2026 than under Obamacare, according to one analysis. Swelling numbers of people unable to pay their medical bills would take billions of dollars out of the health care system, pressuring hospitals, insurers and other health care companies.

House leaders expect an updated analysis of the bill from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office before lawmakers vote on it, Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady told reporters Monday.

Ryan and his GOP lieutenants can afford to lose no more than 21 votes in the chamber, presuming all Democrats vote against the bill.

Medicaid tweaks

The changes to the bill give states another option for how their Medicaid payments from the federal government would be calculated. States could opt for block grant payments, instead of the per-person payment caps that were already in the measure. The so-called manager’s amendment would also repeal ACA taxes this year, one year earlier than originally planned.

Rep. Chris Collins, a New York Republican, also told reporters Monday that leaders agreed to add a special provision to hold $2.3 billion a year in Medicaid funding from New York unless the state’s governor and state legislature agree to stop forcing counties to help pay for Medicaid. He said the change was needed to help persuade most New York Republicans in the House to back the measure.

The Medicaid provision is written to pertain only to New York counties outside of New York City, said Rep. John Faso, a co-author.

The changes didn’t include an alteration some conservative GOP members sought to wind down the ACA expansion of Medicaid starting in 2018 rather than in 2020 as was proposed in the original legislation.

Some moderate Republicans also wanted to increase tax credits for older, poorer people — a demographic that would pay substantially more for health coverage under the GOP bill than under the ACA. Those changes weren’t made in the most recent version, but part of the amendment leaves room for the Senate to increase the tax credits for that group.

Under the original legislation, older Americans would have been hit with significant increases in premiums without adequate financial assistance. This new pot of money is created by a tweak to the bill that lowers the amount Americans can deduct from their taxes for the cost of medical expenses that exceed 10 percent of their income. The threshold would shrink to 5.8 percent.

The Medicaid limits are an appeal to more conservative Republicans. Most members of the Freedom Caucus want to go further and make it mandatory in all states, a GOP aide said.

The caucus would also like to repeal insurance regulations instituted under the ACA, that for example, require health plans to cover services known as essential health benefits, such as hospitalizations, prescription drugs and mental health services.


GOP ACA plan takes hit with CBO’s dire estimates

Anthem sought changes to AHCA in Trump meeting

Are you following us on Facebook?


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.