One question about the current Republican effort to use the budget reconciliation process to attack the Affordable Care Act is whether the effort is really an ACA repeal effort or an ACA maiming effort.
Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, has described Senate Concurrent Resolution 3 as an ACA repeal measure.
The measure would give two committees in the House and Senate instructions to come up with proposed budget changes.
Another measure, House Resolution 5, would let the House consider proposed health care-related budget measures that increase federal spending by a large amount.
The procedural rules are important to any efforts to repeal the ACA, as opposed to cutting funding for ACA programs, because Republicans hold just 52 seats in the Senate.
Senate rules normally require a measure to attract at least 60 votes to overcome the objections of opponents and come up for debate on the Senate floor.
The Senate has developed a special budget resolution and budget reconciliation consideration process to ease passage of budget-related measures. Those can reach the Senate floor with just 51 votes.
But former Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., put a provision in the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 that complicates Republican efforts to use budget reconciliation to repeal any ACA provisions not directly related to federal spending.