Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Health Insurance

Subsidized Colorado exchange users go for deluxe plans

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Affordable Care Act (ACA) health insurance tax credit subsidies may be encouraging low-income Colorado residents to splurge on more expensive coverage.

Managers of the Connect for Health Colorado public exchange have provided evidence for that possibility in a report they included with a new board meeting packet.

ACA tax credit subsidies help exchange users who earn from 100 percent of the federal poverty level to 400 percent of the federal poverty level pay for exchange coverage. Exchange users who earn more than the cut-off have to pay the full cost of the coverage themselves.

In Colorado, the average cost of coverage increased just 9 percent between 2015 and this year for the relatively high-income, non-subsidized users, to about $248 per month.

The total average premium for subsidy users increased about 15 percent, to $448 per month.

See also: Some HealthCare.gov shoppers avoid cheapest plans

Because the average subsidy amount rose 33 percent — to $311 per month, from $234 — the net amount subsidized users are paying for their coverage out of pocket fell 13 percent, to $137 per month.

In Colorado, the average ACA tax credit subsidy amount is now 26 percent higher than the average monthly premium for the non-subsidized exchange users. In 2015, the average monthly subsidy was just 3 percent higher than the average monthly premium for non-subsidized users.

Exchange plan issuers can offer coverage in four different benefits richness “metal levels,” ranging from lean bronze plan coverage up to generous platinum plan coverage.

In Colorado, the gap between the change in the full cost of coverage and the change in the net amount subsidized users actually pay was biggest for silver-plan users. For silver plan users with subsidies, the full cost of coverage increased an average of 17 percent, to $482, and the net amount the enrollees actually paid fell 13 percent, to $143.

See also:

Ancillary benefits market: A public exchange dreams big

What’s PPACA World really like?

  

Have you followed us on Facebook?


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.