(Bloomberg) — Early evidence suggests that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA — “P-packa”) is working — at least in one important respect, according to researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Analysts Nicole Dussault, Maxim Pinkovskiy, and Basit Zafar state that the primary purpose of this law “is not to protect our health per se, but to protect our finances.” And they’ve found a big difference between indebtedness trends in states that embraced the Medicaid expansion versus the ones that did not.
See also: How has PPACA affected people’s health?
The analysts reason that the average amount of debt sent to collections agencies would tend to rise in the event that people without insurance required costly medical attention. Yet, U.S. counties that had a particularly high uninsured rate prior to the implementation of PPACA have seen the per capita collection balance fall if their state embraced the Medicaid expansion. If not, the collection balance continued to climb:
This quintile of counties with the highest rates of uninsured saw the largest improvement in this metric following the Medicaid expansion. “The paths of these counties diverge after the first quarter of 2015,” the analysts write.
The authors caution that this exercise only offers a partial analysis of the law’s effects, as it focuses solely on possible benefits stemming from health care reform and does not take into account any of the costs.