Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
September 01, 2015 at 12:23 PM
(Bloomberg Politics) — My colleague John McCormick dives into the latest Bloomberg Politics/Des Moines Register Iowa Poll today to examine the reason for Donald Trump’s powerful appeal: he’s been able “to sell himself as the straight-talker most candidates aspire to be,” which has landed him squarely in first place.
This is an important insight that I’d carry further, because I think it explains why standard-issue Republican candidates such as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who have tried to emulate Trump, typically fail and will always fail. Calling someone a “straight talker” is code for saying they’re authentic. Trump’s authenticity, and hence his appeal, stems from his willingness to criticize his own party’s priorities (tax and entitlement cuts), not just Democrats’, whereas most pols like Walker who style themselves straight talkers tend to limit their “straight talk” to criticizing the other party’s agenda and wilt when presented with a chance to critique their own side. Voters pick up on this and respond accordingly.
See also: Trump selling deficit spending to conservatives
Over at the Washington Post, Greg Sargent seizes on a great example of Walker totally dodging an invitation to deliver some straight talk, when CNBC’s John Harwood asks him about the upward redistributionary effects of his health care plan. The Trump answer would be something like: “You’re darn right, my plan takes money from the moochers and losers and returns it to the rich.” But Walker mainly dissembles:
Harwood: Obamacare redistributed money from high income taxpayers, from healthy people, from younger people, to people who had less money, who were older and sicker. Your repeal would redistribute that money in the other direction. Given the trends of income disparity in the country, why is this the right time for that kind of redistribution?Walker: Our system’s purely about freedom. It’s about giving people the freedom. The tax credit goes up by age, not by income. It goes up by age because the credit should be connected to what it actually costs people to get health insurance. It’s not about a redistribution of wealth issue.
