Close
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Life Insurance

The life insurance coverage gap: a multi-trillion dollar chasm

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Industry pundits have, for many years, flagged as cause for alarm the lack of financial protection among Americans, especially those in the middle market. Just how concerned should we be? The answer would seem to be “very,” judging by a new study from Conning.

The investment management company’s annual 2015 “Life-Annuity Consumer Markets” report pegs the life insurance protection gap — an aggregate amount combining underinsured and uninsured Americans — at $20.3 trillion. That equates to 60 percent of current in-force life insurance.

“From [an] asset and lost income protection perspective, U.S. consumers are underinsured,” the report states. “Closing this gap has been a persistent challenge for the U.S. life industry, which may need new approaches to increase customer spending on life insurance products.

“Approaching the middle market may require a multifaceted approach, with financial security overall being the service sold, as opposed to particular products,” the report adds.

The study emphasizes that the life insurance coverage gap is “most acute” for those in the middle market. Americans in this income bracket represent more than 30 percent of the in-force face value of current individual life insurance.

On a more positive note, the report observes that more Americans are taking responsibility for building a retirement nest egg. The trend is availing insurers of more opportunities to sell products offering guaranteed income streams.

The potential market is large and growing: Conning pegs defined contribution plan and individual retirement accounts assets that could be converted to annuities at $11 trillion, and adds to this total $5 trillion in non-qualified mutual fund assets.

The study also highlights these findings:

  • The 3rd income quintile ($40,000-$65,500 in household income), present a less attractive opportunity for life insurers, as Americans occupying this income category are financially strained and may find increased life insurance purchases difficult.

  • The 4th income quintile ($65,500-$106,000 in household income) is “far more attractive,” with more flexibility and greater absolute opportunity.

  • For both income quintiles, retirement security is ranked higher in importance than protecting against an untimely death.

  • Opportunities still exist for the high net worth/high income market, as life insurance ownership in face amount has decreased from pre-financial crisis levels.

  • Retirement income is a higher priority for Americans than pure death protection products, so the opportunity for savings products is greater for insurers. The top income quintiles spend 15 times more on retirement savings than on life insurance.

  • Baby boomers still have a need for life insurance products, with combination Life-LTC (long-term care) products being a large opportunity for insurers.

  • Retirement income sales to baby boomers may be skewed to later years because older baby boomers are more likely to have defined benefit (DB) plans and younger boomers are more likely to have defined contribution (DC) plans.