Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Retirement Planning > Saving for Retirement

Workers aren’t seeing the long-term benefits of Roths

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Workers might be saving money for retirement in either a traditional tax-deductible 401(k) or in a Roth 401(k), but they might not understand the differences between the two, so they’re not making an informed decision on which to use or how much to save in each.

That’s according to research from the National Bureau of Economic Research, which looked at the employee contributions at 11 large companies that added a Roth 401(k) option after 2006. The NBER study revealed that there was no significant difference in total contribution rates between those employees hired in the year before the Roth was added and those who were hired immediately afterward.

While a contribution of $1,000 will cost the employee less in take-home pay when going into a traditional 401(k), it will cost the whole $1,000 when going into a Roth, since the money going into a Roth is taxed up front — while withdrawals, including investment returns, are not taxed on withdrawal. But employees either don’t realize that the Roth funds won’t be taxed when they withdraw them on retirement, or are too much in need of the current tax break to wait that long.

The reason the study concluded that people don’t really understand the difference is that contributors could have gotten away with putting less money into a Roth, since because of the tax-free withdrawals at retirement they’d get the same amount of money out that they would have if they’d contributed more money into a traditional plan.

But, said the study, “that’s not what they do.”

And in a separate survey, when people were asked how much an imaginary couple earning $100,000 should contribute to a retirement plan at work, they arrived at the same percentage — approximately 11 percent — regardless of whether they were told the money would be going into a traditional 401(k) plan or into a Roth or into both plans together.

In addition, nearly half of the respondents got both questions wrong when asked two questions about the tax rules that governed Roths and traditional 401(k)s.

Of course, an unrelated Harris Poll has already found results that seem to indicate people can’t figure out how to maximize retirement income so that it will last for their whole retirement; this appears to add additional evidence that participants aren’t thinking far enough ahead about how much they’ll need and how to make sure they get the most bang for their retirement bucks once they do retire.

Do plan advisors need to provide additional education on the tax ramifications of retirement contributions so that participants have a better understanding of how today’s contribution decisions will affect tomorrow’s withdrawals?


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.