Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
May 10, 2015 at 09:00 PM
Since she started her practice, billing clients by the hour, on April Fool’s Day in 1998—“You’ve got to have a sense of humor to be self-employed,” she joked—Sheryl Garrett has seen a lot of advisors follow in her footsteps. Over 320 advisors across the United States are members of the Garrett Planning Network, offering fee-only advice on an hourly basis to middle-income clients.
Back then, though, her elders tried to convince her it was a mistake to not bill based on assets under management. In an interview with Investment Advisor, she recalled one person who said, “’somebody’s going to get those commissions, so it might as well be you.”
She had already been in the business for over a decade, though, and knew that the AUM model didn’t work for what she wanted to do. “I needed to be able to service clients in a way that made sense for me as a professional, as well as if I were the consumer of that financial advice. How would I want to receive advice?”
When she started her practice, she found a lot of lower-net-worth, middle-America investors “don’t want to turn over their control of their portfolio management.”
“Most are average Americans who have the majority of their wealth in their retirement plans at work,” she said. “They needed somebody to turn to, to talk about, ‘Am I saving enough? What else should I be doing? Am I saving in the right places? What else?’”
She sees the proliferation of robo-advisors as a change for the better, as they will put pressure on prices and make financial advice more accessible to more clients. Price compression has already started “to a small extent, but not as much as I would have anticipated on the assets under management,” she said, “especially of passively managed model portfolios where you can go out and get them for 25 or 30 basis points. How in the world can a fiduciary who’s no less skilled […] really beat that?”
There are limitations to expanding access to financial advice through a robo-advisor, though. “The majority of people don’t want to just turn to a website or a calculator. That might solve one or part of their needs, but they do want to connect with a human being to say, ‘Did I do this right? Is this the right calculation? Am I thinking right?’”
Some firms are forgoing minimums, or establishing a division of their firm to serve smaller clients, she said. Others, like Schwab and Fidelity, are building their own robo-advisor offering or partnering with a robo-advisor to reach those lower-net-worth clients.
