Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
November 29, 2011 at 04:56 AM
A memorandum issued on Oct. 14th by Kathy Greenlee, administrator of the CLASS program, to Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius concludes that, “I do not see a path to move forward with CLASS at this time. I recommend that we work together with Congress and stakeholders, including consumers, insurers and employers, to continue exploring all of the options to address the critical long-term care needs of Americans.”
However, the cessation of efforts to implement the CLASS Act does not eliminate the financial long-term care tsunami about to impact American families and taxpayers who already bear much of the cost.
In a sense, CLASS was overly ambitious, especially considering the current economic climate. But ignoring the problem will not make it disappear. What we need are more realistic approaches that can help Americans face and address this issue.
For those who market private long-term care insurance, the shelving of the CLASS Act is in a way anti-climate. That’s because the private long-term care insurance industry will benefit significantly with the government clearly unable to address the issue.
Some insurance professionals anticipated that CLASS would have a positive impact, believing the projected $90-million CLASS awareness program would propel private LTCI sales.
Others, myself included, predicated short-lived positive growth, but we had serious concerns that CLASS would morph private LTCI into more of a supplemental product, similar to Medicare Supplement, and rapidly close down the employer marketplace.
