To paraphrase an old ad slogan, Brian H. Ashe, CLU, knows life insurance. He’s a past president of the Million Dollar Round Table and president of Brian Ashe and Associates Ltd., an insurance sales organization in Lisle, Ill. He’s also a frequent speaker and writer on financial planning issues, having started in the insurance and investment business in 1969.
So if anyone knows about life insurance, it’s Ashe. That’s why Senior Market Advisor asked him about the product and how it pertains to seniors (75 percent of his practice is made up of people over age 55) and the challenges the industry faces.
Here’s what he had to say.
SMA: What life insurance products are proving popular with seniors and boomers?
What Your Peers Are Reading
Brian H. Ashe: Permanent life insurance, whether it’s whole life or universal life or universal life with no-lapse guarantees. All of those products are proving to be attractive to seniors because they believe that their needs are permanent and term insurance usually has a termination point when the premiums you’ve been paying at the relatively low rate suddenly start increasing. I don’t think seniors are fond of being exposed to those types of increases in the years in which they are not making any income.
SMA: What sales techniques would you use to sell to seniors?
Ashe: Seniors have a better perception of risk. If you know you are not going to live forever and you know that investments don’t always give you great returns-and if you know many of the things in life are unexpected-you are more sensitive to risk. There are two primary risks that they have to pay attention to: longevity risk because they have to make sure they have enough money to last as long as they do, and investment risk. We know from an investment risk [standpoint] that since the Depression, every six, eight or 10 years we have reversals in the value of our holdings. So if I were a senior and I knew that there was a chance that either I or my spouse could live for another 30 years, and that means there has to be enough money to pay living expenses, increased medical expenses, increased long-term care and exposure to inflation over 30 years, then I must to find a way to handle both that longevity risk and the investment risk and life insurance happens to be the ideal product to do that because at the moment of death there is a whole bunch of income tax- and often estate tax-free dollars that helps to refill the bucket.
So the approach to speaking with seniors is to go over the increased risk that seniors are now exposed to by the fact that they live longer and since they are not making income anymore, they are exposed on investment risk on what they were able to accumulate during the first 40 or 50 years of their lives.
SMA: Do you encounter price objections?
Ashe: Of course, there is certainly that perception, as there is with most products. People would like to find out whether or not the product pricing is attractive and whether there is something that is less expensive. I would just remind [them] that back 15 or 20 years ago, a lot of life insurance products, the same ones that they are looking right now, cost 40 percent to 60 percent more. So actually, there have been reductions in life insurance pricing, number one.
Number two, the premium is always less than the problem. So if I have a $250,000 or $500,000 problem, because my 401(k) just decreased in value or I’ve got all of these expenses that my spouse would be exposed to in the event of my death, the premium that I pay each year in comparison to the $250,000 or $500,000 death benefit is much smaller. So the problem is the problem; the premium isn’t the problem.
Some people will say, I can’t afford it. They may not be able to afford it and there is nothing we can really do if they don’t have sufficient funds to pay the premium. We do have a variety of products. They still issue term insurance to seniors and they can have a low premium for maybe 10 or 15 years. There is universal life that has a flexible premium. There is whole life that has a guaranteed premium. But the premiums are significantly less than they were before and in comparison to the benefits that are paid, the premium is not the problem. The problem is the problem.