Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Life Insurance

Insurance Update: Dead to Rights

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

If clients want to get a settlement for their life insurance policies, or invest in securitization of life insurance settlements, what should you tell them?

Jeff Feldman, of Rochester Financial Services in Rochester, New York, has as clients an elderly couple who in the 1990s had purchased a whole life joint survivor policy with a death benefit of $500,000. In 2007, now in their early eighties, the couple debated the wisdom of hanging onto the policy, which cost them $15,000 annually in premiums that were scheduled to increase to $20,000.

So they asked Feldman whether it might be more cost effective to do something else, rather than hang onto it. Feldman checked on the policy’s cash value, which was $75,000, and then calculated the break-even point for their heirs. If the couple continued to pay premiums for another 10-12 years, at any point up till then it would still pay for them to keep the policy in force. If, however, they lived beyond that point, they would have spent more in premiums than the policy would pay–and given their health, that was a possibility. He also analyzed the policy versus what they could get if they bought a new policy.

“Their 15-year-old policy wasn’t the best,” Feldman says, adding that if they had wanted to keep a policy in force for estate planning reasons, “I would [have] recommend[ed] they cancel that one and get a new one. They could do better shopping for a new policy even at that age.”

Feldman suggested they might be able to get more than the cash value if they sold the policy to investors rather than surrendering it, and they got in touch with the agent who had originally sold them the policy. He helped them find a buyer, and after “upwards of a year,” says Feldman, from the time they first considered the idea, the deal was completed. The couple netted $105,000 after all the expenses involved in selling the policy were paid.

Time and Medicine

Part of the reason the life settlement process took so long in these clients’ case, says Feldman, was the necessity of having medical reports done. “Copies of their medical history had to be sent to finalize the deal. That’s the big time factor, the medical situation. That will determine what the true value of the transaction is: their health.” Feldman points out that the amount of time involved in such a transaction can be a factor in deciding whether to do it or not. “When you’re talking about the elderly, time could make a big difference. If they don’t pay their premiums the cash value could be declining while they’re going through the process.”

Stuart Egrin, director of regulatory affairs at Invescor, which provides life settlement back office and brokerage services to broker/dealers and insurance companies, says there are two main elements involved in selling a policy for a settlement. The first is emotional. “‘When I die, my family’s not getting the money; an investor is.’ Also, by state law, the investor has a right to check up on your health. Is that something you’re psychologically up for?”

The second factor is financial. Egrin says the paperwork involved can make a mortgage look easy, and it can take two to six months because of all the documentation requirements. It’s not that easy, either, to determine the value of the policy. Not only must the cash value be considered, but also the potential value of the policy on the secondary market, which may or may not be worth the effort once taxes, fees, and other expenses are considered. However, if the end result is that your client will come out with a substantial sum, a settlement can fill a need.

Securitization is another matter. Egrin says that the pricing of such investments is very difficult. Some, he explains, are priced incorrectly because of a problem with the life expectancy reports used in determining settlement amounts before the fall of 2008. These reports, used by settlement providers as much as stock analysts’ reports are used by portfolio managers, were off by 20% to 30%, which meant that those portfolios were incorrectly priced and their expected return was severely cut.


Marlene Y. Satter, is a freelance business writer who can be reached at [email protected].

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.