Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Financial Planning > Tax Planning

Bailouts & Benefits

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Prevention is the best cure. Turning off the credit spigot in time would have been the most effective way to prevent the current financial meltdown. Government regulators being asleep at the wheel allowed financial institutions to gorge on easily available credit and load up on toxic mortgage debt. This served as spring board for the perfect storm.

The Financial Select Sector SPDRs (XLF) and other financial ETFs have lost over half their value since their 2007 highs. Some company’s share prices have plummeted by more than 99% while others simply ceased to exist. Survival of the fittest is the current theme of the financial world.

With big fanfare the government, Treasury Secretary and SEC announced a wholesale solution to the problem; A $700 billion bailout, which might actually cost closer to a trillion. The bailout idea was flawed from the beginning. Why would you throw $700 billion of good cash after a crumbling sector? Would it make sense to shore up a sector like consumer staples? No doubt, companies like McDonalds and Proctor & Gamble could use a boost.

In theory, the $700 billion package was supposed to increase liquidity. This makes sense in a theoretic world but what about reality? Japan has given us a window into reality. None of their government’s stimulus package has lifted Japan’s economy out of the recession. Banks are hoarding their money because they know they’ll need it. Why should it be different in the U.S.?

The bailout bill was the opportunity of a lifetime to get all different kinds personal agendas added to the overall package. Congress wanted to improve their public image and so they were in a position to demand their “pork” to be included. Pork is a “sweetener” used to secure a vote.

Here is some of the approved pork (you couldn’t even make this up if you tried): Income averaging for amounts received in connection with the Exxon Valdez litigation; Tax incentive program to keep TV productions in the U.S.; Tariff relief for wool producers; Transportation fringe benefit to bicycle commuters; Exemption from tax for wooden arrows; Increase in limit for Puerto Rico rum tax.

In summary, be grateful that Congress has given us something to laugh about. The boom was fun while it lasted, but the bust is turning out to be less than funny.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.