Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
July 01, 2008 at 08:00 PM
“Seniors don’t need life insurance.” That’s often true, but universal life can be a valuable resource for older clients who do need insurance. The product’s unique structure offers the flexibility needed for changing circumstances, and the availability of guaranteed UL can provide an insurance “safety net” to allay clients’ concerns. Variable universal life can help clients accumulate wealth in a tax-favored contract. According to the advisors interviewed for this article, UL and VUL are valuable planning tools that every senior market advisor should consider in the appropriate circumstances.
Reducing the pension bite
Workers fortunate enough to have pension plans are often surprised to learn their monthly retirement benefit assumes a single life payout. If they want a joint-and-survivor pension, which is the required default, the survivor’s benefit can range from 50 percent to 100 percent of the retiree’s benefit. Greg Gardner, CFP, with the Gardner Group in Dallas has found that the differential between the single-life and joint-and-survivor benefits varies significantly among clients. In some cases, it is small. In other cases, however, the difference is significant and taking the joint-and-survivor annuity option imposes a large decrease in retirement income. But in every case, he notes, the pension ends with the single- or two-life payout, even if the pension has a present value worth millions of dollars. When the recipients die, the payments stop and there is no legacy for heirs.
These factors create planning opportunities, Gardner says. In some cases, it makes sense for the retiree to take a single-life annuity and use part of the higher pension payment to purchase a UL contract, naming the spouse or a trust for the spouse’s benefit as beneficiary. If the retiree dies before his spouse, she can invest the policy proceeds for income. If the spouse dies first, the retiree can redeem the policy or name other beneficiaries to create a family or charitable legacy.
The merits of this approach depend on the numbers and the client’s wishes, Gardner says. If the single-life annuity pays a significantly greater benefit than the two-life annuity, then the UL-strategy can benefit the clients. If the difference between the payout options is relatively small, however, the two-life option can be the better solution. Gardner has implemented this strategy in three cases and is working on a fourth. “If the client is in his late fifties or early sixties, it helps if the spouse is much younger because that affects the payout option,” he says. “It also helps (reduce ongoing premiums) if he is healthy.”
Leaving a legacy
Retirees worry about spending principal and running out of money for two reasons. The first reason — sustaining their lifestyle — is obvious. But the second reason can be just as important, says Herb Daroff, J.D., CFP, with Baystate Financial Services LLC in Boston. Retirees are concerned that if they spend the principal from their retirement plans and other assets, they will deplete the legacy they want to leave for their heirs. Using part of a monthly pension to pay for a UL policy that will “replenish” assets can relieve clients’ concern.
Additionally, estate and income taxes on retirement plans left to heirs can erode the plans’ after-tax value. Daroff says this distribution-taxation is another problem where guaranteed UL can work for seniors by helping convert a stretch IRA into a Roth IRA. Roth conversions, except for those done in 2010, are subject to earned income limits. Assuming the client can keep his income under the limit, the strategy is to convert the client’s regular IRA to a Roth, incur the income taxes due on conversion and use the UL policy proceeds to pay the taxes. Assets distributed to the beneficiaries of the Roth IRA after the IRA owner’s death are considered qualified distributions and are tax-free.
Funding a buy-sell
Pat Nowak, CLU, ChFC, LUTCF with Nowak & Nowak Financial Services in Williston, Vt., recently used guaranteed UL to fund a cross-purchase buy-sell agreement. One of the company’s two owners had died and his share had gone to his two sons, who joined the business with the surviving owner, their uncle. Nowak met with them to talk about the different types of products they could use for the buy-sell. The sons asked about term insurance and Nowak suggested they consider guaranteed UL, which would function similar to term but also provide guarantees beyond the usual term policy limit of 10 or 20 years.
“The sons were considerably younger than their uncle, but their health was not quite as good as his,” says Nowak. “The premiums wound up being quite compatible amongst the three of them. I suggested the nephews retain the policies on the uncle after he retires in a few years in order to recoup the money they will have put out. They agreed, and we set up a cross-purchase agreement set up with the three of them. The brothers also bought policies on each other to age 85.”
