Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Life Insurance

NAIC Adopts Viatical Settlement Changes

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Members of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners voted here today to approve amendments to the Viatical Settlements Model Act.

The Viatical Settlements model revision was the first measure to be adopted under a new NAIC procedures for screening proposed models.

The exact vote tally was not immediately available at press time, but Nevada, New York, Montana, Washington and Virginia abstained from voting for the model, at least in part because of concerns about the new model screening process.

California had also indicated that it would abstain, but it was not among the states listed as abstaining after the vote.

New York noted in an explanation of its decision to abstain that, in addition to having concerns about process, it believes the amended Viatical Settlement model needs stronger privacy protection provisions.

Concerns about process focused on new standards that the NAIC has developed for deciding whether proposed models should go before the plenary, the body that represents all voting members of the NAIC.

The NAIC’s executive committee must decide that a model involves matters that require uniformity, and that many commissioners will commit significant resources to implementing the model in their home states.

Some commissioners asked during discussion what NAIC leaders mean by the new resource commitment requirement.

Sandy Praeger, NAIC president-elect and Kansas insurance commissioner, said commissioners do not have to promise to get a model enacted in their home states exactly as passed to comply with the new requirement that they commit to bringing a model back to their states.

Other commissioners said colleagues should avoid focusing too intently on process.

If NAIC commissioners get hung up on process, rather than focusing on the public policy merits of the Viatical Settlements model draft and other proposed models, that will “absolutely cripple the organization,” said Jim Poolman, the North Dakota insurance commissioner, who helped develop the Viatical Settlements model.

Julie McPeak, Kentucky executive director and chair of the NAIC’s Life Insurance and Annuities Committee, said the amended model will meet the new “uniformity” standard, because 35 states have the Viatical Settlements model on their books.

In addition, “this model addresses lots of issues in the market today,” McPeak said.

McPeak praised model provisions that would increase disclosure requirements for brokers and providers, set bonding requirements for settlement providers, and ensure that brokers would receive at least 15 hours of continuing education every 2 years.

Another provision, which would put restrictions on the sale of life policies for 5 years after they were purchased, would reduce the return on the sale of a contract, discourage use of stranger-owned life insurance contracts and cut down on reliance on non-recourse premium financing, McPeak said.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.