Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Life Insurance

Planning Client Sues Over Proprietary Product Incentives

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Lawyers are trying to organize a class-action suit in connection with allegations that a company used what seemed to be an independent financial advice operation to push its own products.

Lawyers at Federman & Sherwood, Oklahoma City, Okla., and Behlen, Bentwood & Luther, Oklahoma City, are seeking class-action status for a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma on behalf of Robert Thomas and other consumers who bought proprietary products from the defendants between January 1998 and June 2004.

The defendants are Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Securities Inc. and MetLife Investment Advisors Company L.L.C., affiliates of MetLife Inc., New York.

“We’re just going through [the complaint] now,” MetLife spokesman Holly Sheffer says.

The plaintiff accuses the defendants of violating Oklahoma laws, federal securities laws and regulations, and conduct rules established by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Washington, by using hidden and poorly disclosed incentives to sell proprietary mutual funds and life insurance policies to consumers who believed they were purchasing financial planning services.

The defendants had a fiduciary obligation to place the interests of the client above their own and disclose possible conflicts of interest, the plaintiff alleges in the complaint.

The main mutual fund shares the financial planners sold came with a 5.75% front-end load, which was used to pay for health insurance and vacation pay for the agents, the plaintiff alleges.

The agents received a 2% front-end fee for selling the proprietary funds and a 0.75% front-end fee for selling other funds, the plaintiff alleges.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.