L44fasbAB.xml Government– go page xx, with –about 122 lines. Graphic: none
FASB Polishes Valuation Rules
For Life Settlements
Members of the Financial Accounting Standards Board are moving ahead with efforts to put major new life settlement accounting rules in place by mid-2006.
Board members discussed the mechanics of implementing the proposed rules and related topics during a board meeting earlier this month.
The proposed rules could sharply increase the carrying value of life settlement companies’ portfolios of life insurance policies, and some FASB members said they wish they could let life settlement companies apply the proposed rules to 2005 financial statements.
Today, in the life settlement industry, “the accounting that exists is not good,” said George Batavick, a FASB member who is a former comptroller of Texaco Inc., Harrison, N.Y.
FASB, Norwalk, Conn., is the organization responsible for developing U.S. financial accounting standards.
A life settlement accounting guide that FASB issued in 1985, Technical Bulletin 85-4, requires companies that buy life insurance contracts to treat the policies as assets with values equal to or less than their cash surrender values. Life settlement companies can record income related to the policies and bigger asset totals only when the insureds die and death benefits arrive.
Because policy purchasers end up recording losses when they buy the policies, most U.S. life settlement “providers” act mainly as facilitators for life settlement transactions. The actual policy purchasers are investors, according to a comment letter that Brad Thompson, an accountant who belongs to the Viatical and Life Settlement Association of America, Orlando, Fla., sent to FASB in July on behalf of the VLSAA.
FASB members decided in October that life settlement companies can choose between 2 valuation methods that may produce values that are higher than the cash surrender value: The investment method and a fair value approach.
If a life settlement company uses the investment method, it can take the price it pays for a policy, add the amount of premiums it pays to keep the policy in force and count the total as the policy’s value as an asset.