Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Portfolio > Mutual Funds > Bond Funds

30-Year Bonds May Return, Will Investors?

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Earlier this month, the U.S. Treasury Department said it may reissue 30-year bonds as the government grapples with financing record budget deficits. The long-bond program was suspended in October 2001.

The about face reflects dramatic changes in the nation’s geopolitical profile following the costly obligations of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the recession of 2001, President Bush’s massive tax cuts, and a proposal to privatize Social Security.

When 30-year bonds were eliminated in late 2001, the world was a very different place. The U.S. Congress predicted years of surpluses, which would eventually wipe out the national debt, and hoped to save money by shortening the average maturity of public debt and by no longer issuing higher-yielding long-term debt.

But after posting a handsome surplus of $236 billion in 2000, the fourth straight year of such surpluses, the government incurred deficits of approximately $400 billion in each of the next four years, including a record $412 billion in 2004. The figure is expected to reach $427 billion this year. Now, by proposing a return to 30-year bonds, the government appears to believe the deficit will continue to grow, exacerbated by baby-boomers about to enter into retirement.

With short-term interest rates steadily rising, the government is finding it more attractive to move federal debt away from short-term financing. Also, as the gap between short-term and long-term interest rates narrows, it makes more sense to borrow long. By issuing new 30-year bonds, the Treasury could reduce its cost of borrowing over the long term by attracting new investors, diversifying their issuance, and reducing their exposure to possibly higher short- and medium-term rates. Some European governments, including France and Britain, have already issued long-dated securities, even a 50-year bond, to meet the demand from pension funds for their ageing populations.

Assuming the plan goes through, the Treasury said it would conduct two auctions next year, the first in February 2006. Each would be valued at between $10 to $15 billion. A final decision on the issuance will come in early August, though many believe it is already a fait accompli.

James Cusser, sole manager of the $243-million Waddell & Reed Advisors Government Securities Fund/A (UNGVX) and the $676-million Waddell & Reed Advisors Bond Fund/A (UNBDX), said there will be great demand for these new 30-year bonds, “particularly from defined-benefit pension funds and insurance companies, who are seeking to match their long-term obligations with long-term assets.”

Brian Howell, co-manager of American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate (TWSMX) and senior portfolio manager for taxable bond strategies, said he sees a “reasonable demand” for these new bonds from typical long-term investors, particularly as a duration instrument. “As a pure duration play, there is no substitute for these 30-year securities,” he said. “Bond fund managers would also likely invest in these securities — again, to add duration to their portfolios.”

Howell noted that while 30-year bonds are probably not ideal for individual investors, “they might appeal to some investors who are looking for long-term secure income, a little yield, and not much risk.” However, he thinks institutional buyers will form the bulk of investors for these new bonds.

“A big point for individual investors is that the 30-year Treasuries are a pure duration bet,” said Gary Arne, managing director, financial services and global practice leader for fund ratings & evaluations at Standard & Poor’s. “And since the 30-year Treasury is so long on duration, it offers less risk from a price and total return perspective when long-term rates are headed down, not up.” Arne added that most bond fund managers are currently “sticking pretty short now, most likely to avoid market price declines when long-term rates increase.” But so far this year, long-term rates have not moved, he noted.

“Most individual investors should not be buying 30-year bonds,” said Scot W. Johnson, lead portfolio manager of the $865-million AIM Intermediate Government Fund/A (AGOVX), and the $312-million AIM Limited Maturity Treasury Fund/A (SHTIX). “One of the roles bonds play in individual investment portfolios is to provide some stability to offset more volatile assets like stocks. When you start buying 30-year bonds, you limit the stability your bond holdings provide. For any movement in interest rates, you can expect 30-year bond prices to move twice as much as prices on 10-year notes. In exchange, you get only about 35 basis points more in yield. For me, that’s not a good risk-return trade off.”

One of the major themes in long-term bond investing, characterized as a “conundrum” by Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, is that long-term rates remain at historic low levels, even as the Fed has steadily boosted short-term rates for the past year. As a result, the yield curve, the gap between short- and long-term interest rates, is flattening. No one, not even Greenspan, can explain why this is happening.

While short-term interest rates are determined solely by Fed policy, longer-term rates reflect a number of factors, including expectations for economic growth, inflation trends and monetary policy.

Cusser said he believes longer-term interest rates are headed up. “If we assume the economy will grow above 3% annually, and long-term rates rise, buying a long-term bond might not be a good idea,” he said. “However, with a long-term investment perspective, I like to keep a barbelled portfolio, with both longer-term and shorter-term securities, although my average duration will closely match that of my index. However, most of my long-end exposure is currently in corporates, not Treasuries.”

Johnson also believes long-term rates are headed higher. “As such, the Treasury portion of our portfolios are barbelled in structure,” he said. “Rather than owning intermediate maturities (3 to 5 years), we own both shorter paper and longer paper. The 30-year bond would fit into our strategy, because it would provide a more liquid market in the long end of the Treasury curve.”

Cathy Roy, chief investment officer for fixed income at Calvert Group, said the biggest risk inherent with the 30-year bond relates to duration risk. “The movement of interest rates has a much bigger impact on a long-term security than a shorter-dated one,” she said. “I think we’re in an environment of rising interest rates, both short term and long term. As inflation creeps up, longer-term rates will likely rise.”

Johnson notes the biggest risk with investing in 30-year bonds lies with their price volatility. “For a 1% rise in interest rates, the price of a 30-year bond will fall about 15%,” he said. “For that same 1% rise in rates, the price of a 10-year note will only fall about 8%. You also want to consider that you’re locking in an interest rate for 30 years. In five years, are you going to be glad you’re collecting a 4.375% coupon for another twenty-five years?”

Roy believes the only way the Treasury will cancel or postpone this reissuance program would be if long-term rates rose by at least 100 basis point prior to next February. “But that scenario is unlikely,” she noted.

Gregory Whiteley, a portfolio manager in charge of TCW’s U.S. government strategies, said funds seeking longer-duration assets would likely invest in the new 30-year Treasury bonds, but that the bonds would not form a “vital” part of new investments. “A new 30-year Treasury bond would be comparatively expensive and would yield less than some of the other outstanding longer-duration Treasuries.” However, Whiteley added that if 30-year notes were added as components to major fixed-income benchmark indices, it would prompt bond managers to add them to their portfolios.

The current market of 30-year bonds amounts to under $20 billion. As a result, a tremendous amount of supply would come on-line next year, leading some observers to worry that prices of these bonds would be hurt. On the day the government announced a possible resumption, the price of existing 30-year bonds dropped, pushing the yield to 4.59% from 4.48%. However, as Whiteley noted, after the initial reaction, 30-year bond prices recovered and yields declined again, perhaps implying that investors expect long-term rates will remain modest, despite the new supply.

“I’d say the near-term environment is reasonably favorable for long-term bonds,” said Whiteley. “Economists have been calling for an increase in interest rates, and with the exception of short-term rates, this hasn’t occurred. We’ve seen a little blip of inflation, but it won’t be a problem over the next year. Plus, there are several sources of demand for long-term bonds.”

There are numerous long-term government bond funds, many of which are likely to invest in 30-year bonds if they become available next year. The best-performing funds from this sector are listed below for the one-, three-, and five-year periods. In addition, there is an exchange-traded fund, the $669-million iShares Lehman 20+ Treasury Bond Fund (TLT) from Barclay Global Investors. As of March 31, it had 21.3% of its assets invested in securities with maturities between 25 and 30 years, with an average weighted maturity of about 23 years.


Source: Standard & Poor’s. Total returns are in U.S. dollars and include reinvested dividends. Data as of 5/21/05.

Fund Return (%)

S&P Star Rank

American Century Target Maturity 2030/Inv (ACTAX) +43.51


American Century Target Maturity 2025/Inv (BTTRX) +36.88


American Century Target Maturity 2020/Inv (BTTTX) +26.63


ProFunds:US Government Plus/Iv (GVPIX) +25.25


Wasatch-Hoisington:US Treasury Fund (WHOSX) +24.42


Average Fund In Sector: +11.36%
Fund Annualized Return (%)

S&P Star Rank

American Century Target Maturity 2030/Inv (ACTAX) +20.16


American Century Target Maturity 2025/Inv (BTTRX) +18.11


American Century Target Maturity 2020/Inv (BTTTX) +15.74


PIMCO Funds:Real Return Asset/Ist (PRAIX) +13.15


Wasatch-Hoisington:US Treasury Fund (WHOSX) +12.71


Average Fund In Sector: +9.56%
Fund Annualized Return (%)

S&P Star Rank

American Century Target Maturity 2025/Inv (BTTRX) +13.90


American Century Target Maturity 2020/Inv (BTTTX) +13.35


American Century Target Maturity 2015/Inv (BTFTX) +11.89


PIMCO Funds:Long Term US Government/Ist (PGOVX) +11.26


Wasatch-Hoisington:US Treasury Fund (WHOSX) +11.20


Average Fund In Sector: +9.99%

Contact Bob Keane with questions or comments at: [email protected].


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.