Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Life Insurance

Leveraging the QPIP To Avoid The 70% Tax Trap

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Leveraging The QPIP To Avoid The 70% Tax Trap

By Warren S. Hersch

Individual retirement accounts have long been touted as vehicles to protect savings from taxation on ordinary income. But affluent boomers edging into retirement still must grapple with how to insulate the IRA (or pension plan) from the potentially devastating ravages of the estate tax. One option to weigh: the qualified plan insurance partnership.

“A QPIP lets clients use money in a qualified plan or IRA to buy life insurance in a tax-favorable manner, where the ultimate beneficiary is an irrevocable life insurance trust,” says Roccy DeFrancesco Jr., a wealth preservation planner with the Wealth Preservation Institute, New Buffalo, Mich. “The result is that policy death benefits pass to heirs free of both income and estate taxes.”

Thats a desirable outcome, but couldnt it be achieved by other means? DeFrancesco says no, observing that other popular tax-advantaged vehicles either incur estate tax penalties or sidestep the tax by cutting the heirs inheritance.

Consider an IRA or pension plan holding $1 million in assets. Federal estate tax would shave $500,000 from the total. Federal income tax, factoring in the estate tax paid, would cut another $200,000. That leaves just $300,000 net to heirsnot including state taxes.

“This 70% tax trap, which concerns income in respect to a decedent, or IRD, is the worst kind of money in a clients estate because its money that ultimately will be double taxed by the IRS,” says DeFrancesco. “Most clients dont know about the problem. Theyre operating out of ignorance.”

Solutions that advisors typically propose to avoid the double taxation all have problems, he adds. Among them: the so-called “stretch IRA.”

The technique extends the duration of traditional and Roth IRA distributions to certain successor beneficiaries, beyond the death of an original designated beneficiary. The stretch thus delays income taxes due on an IRAs distribution by using a clients child as the “measuring life.”

The catch is the stretch does not forestall estate taxes. Revisiting the above example, the child would still pay $500,000 in death taxes on the IRA, says DeFrancesco. Unless the child buys life insurance to cover the estate taxes, he or she likely would have to withdraw additional funds from the IRA to cover the tax.

An alternative to the stretch IRA, the charitable trust, can receive a gifted individual retirement account or pension plan only upon the clients death. That lets the client avoid estate taxesbut at the childrens expense. While they may draw a salary as trustees, the children will derive little or no residual funds from the IRA.

Yet another technique, dubbed “liquidate and leverage,” has the client withdraw funds from the qualified plan or IRA, pay income tax on the distribution, and buy life insurance to cover the income and estate taxes on the qualified asset. This solution is less than optimal, observes DeFrancesco, because clients have to make large premium payments to an ILIT, which uses up their estate tax credit.

“This strategy is painful, but at least you can put money into a life insurance policy to cover estate taxes,” says DeFrancesco. “Thats better than nothing, but there are superior solutions. Also, the premiums that older clients must gift to an ILIT are so high that they would have a gift tax problem, as they would be using up their unified [estate and gift tax] credit.”

Other popular tax techniquesbuying life insurance inside an employer-sponsored 412(i) qualified plan and pension (or IRA) rescuehave their own drawbacks.

The first, says DeFrancesco, would be subject to both income and estate taxes; and, for a comparable retirement benefit, the method costs double the amount of money of wrapping the 412(i) around an annuity. The second, which leverages a “5-pay sponge policy” (i.e., one with a low cash surrender value that can be removed from a profit-sharing plan at an 80% income tax discount), was killed in February 2004 by IRS 2004-16. The revenue ruling aimed to shut down “abusive” 412(i) plans by restricting how cash values can be calculated.

And so we return to the QPIP. The technique calls for joining the retirement account, the participant (client) and an irrevocable life insurance trust to form a limited liability company.

The participant makes a nominal contribution to the LLC (preferably pegged to a long-term applicable federal rate or AFR) in exchange for a membership interest. The retirement account (IRA or pension plan) provides the majority capitalization, with the ILIT making the balance of contributions.

The LLC invests these contributions, using the earnings (and principal, if necessary) to purchase an insurance contract on the life of the participant, which names the LLC as a beneficiary. Each year, an amount equal to the cost of the contracts death benefit would be charged against the capital account of the trust. The balance of the premium is charged against the capital account of the retirement account.

When the client dies, the IRA will be refunded for premiums it paid to the LLC, plus a minimum rate of return, such as the long-term AFR. The balance of assets in the LLC (the remaining death benefit) will go to the ILIT. That death benefit can then be disbursed to beneficiaries free of income and estate taxes.

“This is the guts of the plan,” says DeFrancesco. “The QPIP is a really neat tool that advisors can leverage to differentiate themselves in the marketplace and help clients avoid a double tax that many dont even know exists.”

Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, April 15, 2005. Copyright 2005 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.