Podcast Center
Video Center
Webcasts
Resource Center
Events
November 09, 2003 at 07:00 PM
By
If banks are to pump up their slim share of the life insurance market, insurers must improve their point-of-sales and training support for bank staffs, say researchers who recently studied banks lack of success in the market (see NU, Oct. 20, p. 8).
The study, sponsored by the American Council of Life Insurers in Washington, found among other things that 49% of banks selling life insurance sold fewer than 1,000 policies in 2001.
Banks have yet to make a big splash in the life insurance market, despite the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which did away with a number of legal barriers to bank sales of insurance and other financial products.
Bank sales accounted for only 2.5% of the total U.S. life insurance market in the first half of 2003, according to research by Kenneth Kehrer Associates, Princeton, N.J. This was up from 1.7% in the first half of last year.
Although banks and life insurers seem in relative agreement about what they need to do to spark sales, the ACLI study found a number of areas where the two industries need to work more closely together.
One key issue found by the study was that of insurer-provided training for bank platform and licensed personnel.
Although banks and insurers both ranked such training high in importance, banks rated their satisfaction with insurer training relatively low, giving it 5.4 on a scale of 10. Insurers, on the other hand, gave themselves a 7.3 rating for training.
In the words of ACLI, “Banks are not relying on the insurers capacity to provide training and licensing, and they are only partially satisfied with what they are receiving.”
Banks rated the adequacy of training that insurers provided for new product rollouts at 5.9, compared to 8.1 by insurers, an “extremely significant” gap of 2.2, ACLI says. The perception gap over the amount of training offered was just a little lower for existing products, with banks rating the adequacy of insurer-provided training at 5.9, as against 7.5 by insurers.
Banks showed the least satisfaction with customer service training, with 53% thinking this was adequate to considerable, compared to 81% of insurers.
“Banks say they would like to do more and even use third parties [to provide training],” says Carmen Effron, president of the consulting firm, CF Effron Company, LLC, Westport, Conn., a coauthor of the ACLI study.
The problem for banks is finding the time to teach their people, Effron says. She points out life insurance is just one of many financial products that banks sell.
“Theres a shelf space issue,” she says. “Theres so much training banks want their people to go through. Insurance adds another level of complexity.”
Insurers can reduce the gap by making sure banks clearly understand how much time will be needed to train bank producers, Effron advises.
“Then its up to the banks to say they can or cant accommodate that,” she says.
When there is an honest, upfront discussion about what is needed to meet production goals, expectations on both sides will be closer to reality, Effron says.
