Close Close
Sign In
Newsletters
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
Podcast Center Video Center Webcasts Resource Center Events
About ThinkAdvisor Contact Us Advertise With Us Asset & Logo Licensing Sitemap Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
ThinkAdvisor

Life Health > Life Insurance

New York Expands On Insurers' Default Testing

By Allison Bell

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

New York Expands On Insurers Default Testing

By

New York state insurance regulators have given life insurers more instructions about how to incorporate worries about bond defaults into their annual reserve analyses.

The regulators warned in a November 2002 circular letter that a life insurer would have to do more than show it had enough reserves to cope with occasional bond defaults. But that letter gave only general guidelines, and many insurers had questions about how to implement it.

The regulators have followed up with a second letter giving a few more details.

This year, for example, life insurers will have to test the corporate bonds and related investments in their portfolios using the assumption that, after defaults, the corporate bonds will yield only one percentage point more than comparable U.S. Treasuries.

“The purpose of this test is to provide a common frame of reference to identify situations where significant default risk may exist,” the regulators write in the latest letter.

But in some cases, the regulators concede, assuming an investment will yield only one percentage point more than comparable U.S. Treasuries will be too conservative.

“Professional judgement should be used to produce results that comply with the spirit of this request and a variety of alternative approaches may be acceptable,” the regulators write. “In any event, appropriate explanation and justification should be provided for the methodology that was employed and the results that were obtained.”

The letter is available on the Web at http://www.ins.state.ny.us/acrobat/res7.pdf.

Reproduced from National Underwriter Edition, February 3, 2003. Copyright 2003 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.