Anti-Money Laundering Rule Needs Changes On Life Products, Agents
Passed in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the USA Patriot Act had a worthwhile aim: to combat the laundering of money that could be used to finance terrorist activities through financial institutions.
In its haste to pass the bill, Congress did with the Patriot Act what it has done increasingly with legislation of broad scope: It created the canvas and left a government agency, in this case the Treasury Department, to propose and implement the actual painting, so to speak.
Continuing the analogy, the painters have used a very broad brush in their inclusion of financial institutions and products under the regulation proposed by Treasury.
Recognizing this, the American Council of Life Insurers has correctly told Treasury in formal comments that certain products–including life reinsurance, group life, term life and credit life insurance–should be exempt from the proposed rule because they do not lend themselves to being used as money-laundering vehicles.
The ACLI is also asking Treasury to revise its proposed rule to clarify its application to independent agents and to broker-dealers already subject to anti-money laundering requirements.
The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors is also seeking clarification of the rule as it applies to agents and brokers.
Both organizations make strong points in support of their arguments.
In terms of the products that should be exempted, ACLI very clearly described how little possibility for money laundering each of them offers.