Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards

Life Health > Life Insurance

Big Win For Industry In Stimulus Package

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.



Life insurance companies won a major legislative victory when Congress passed and President Bush signed an economic stimulus package that retroactively extends the 2001 treatment of investment income earned by foreign subsidiaries of U.S. financial services firms.

The legislation extends the 2001 treatment of the affected income under Subpart F of the tax code for five years retroactive to Jan. 1, 2002.

Moreover, the package contains a provision allowing life insurers with foreign subsidiaries to use the reserving method of the foreign country, if it can be shown that the reserving method cannot be used to hide income from the IRS.

Previously, life insurance complained they had to calculate reserves twice, once using the foreign methodology and again using U.S. methodology.

Moreover, life insurers argued the U.S. methodology often resulted in a smaller reserve calculation than the foreign country required.

The five-year extension was an added victory for the industry. In his fiscal year 2003 budget, the president proposed only a two-year extension.

Jack Dolan, a spokesman for the American Council of Life Insurers, says the Subpart F language is significant in that it will help secure the future of U.S. life insurers that operate overseas.

However, Dolan says, ACLI will still seek a permanent extension of the Subpart F language.

Enactment of the stimulus package means the affected income will be subject to U.S. taxation only after the parent company receives it. Without the extension, the income would have been immediately subject to U.S. tax as soon as it was earned by the subsidiary, even if the parent had not received it.

Financial services companies argued this treatment differs from that afforded similar income earned by commercial companies. Moreover, they said, this puts U.S. financial services firms at a competitive disadvantage versus foreign companies.

However, the stimulus package also threw something of a curve ball at the life industry. The package contains a three-year suspension of Section 809 of the tax code, the provision that imposes a tax on mutual companies based on the earnings of stock companies.

However, there is no suspension of Section 815 of the tax code, which deals with policyholder surplus accounts held by stock companies. Sections 809 and 815 had been linked in the life industrys lobbying efforts.

ACLI had no comment on the outcome.

However, another source, who asked not to be identified, told National Underwriter that House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas, R-Calif., believed there was a genuine fairness issue facing mutual companies due to Section 809.

Section 809, this source says, imposes the tax on mutual companies based on an average of stock company earnings over the previous three years.

However, because of the recession and other factors, Thomas believed that calculating the Section 809 tax using this method would impose a levy on mutuals that did not reflect economic realities, this source says.

The source says life insurers talked to both Ways and Means and the Treasury Department about the political need to keep Sections 809 and 815 together. However, the source says, they did not see the same fairness issue with 815 as they did with 809.

In other news, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., says optional federal chartering of insurers is the “unfinished business” of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

The insurance industry is moving quickly and is more global, he says. The product approval system, which requires insurance companies to jump through 50 hoops before they can bring a product to market, just doesnt make sense, he says.

Moreover, he says, in light of the controversy over terrorism reinsurance, it is clear the federal government needs to expand its understanding of insurance.

Schumer, who is sponsoring an optional federal chartering bill , says there has to be a federal regulatory structure that complements but does not supplant the state regulatory system.

This will not happen immediately, he says, and indeed, it will probably take several Congresses to enact optional federal chartering.

However, he says, it is important to jump-start the debate now. He says he hopes the Senate Banking Committee will hold hearings this summer.

In addition, Schumer says, Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., is considering co-sponsoring his legislation, which would give it bipartisan support.

Schumer urges those who support optional federal chartering to get behind his effort. If so, he says, it will not be a 25-year road-to-hoe as was GLB.

Finally, by a 233-190 vote, the House of Representatives approved H.R. 2341, the Class Action Fairness Act, which would give federal courts jurisdiction over major class action lawsuits.

The legislation was strongly supported by ACLI.

However, H.R. 2341 is expected to face tougher going in the Senate, where the parliamentary rules make it easier to stop legislation.

Reproduced from National Underwriter Life & Health/Financial Services Edition, March 18, 2002. Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company in the serial publication. All rights reserved.Copyright in this article as an independent work may be held by the author.

Copyright 2002 by The National Underwriter Company. All rights reserved. Contact Webmaster


© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.