Californians for Disability Rights, a nonprofit organization based in Oakland, filed a lawsuit July 24 in state court against Bank of America and Provident Life and Accident over an insurance application that it claims is illegal.
The suit charges that some health-related questions in an application for a term policy sold through BOA are discriminatory. CDR accuses the San Francisco-based bank and the Chattannoga, Tenn., insurer with fraudulent and unfair business practices against disabled people.
The suit grows out of a BOA direct mail campaign in May to 3.8 million checking account customers, a CDR spokesperson says. The mailing offered term life insurance to those willing to sign a “Good Health Statement.”
What Your Peers Are Reading
The “fine print” on that statement contains several discriminatory provisions, claims Sidney Wolinsky, head of litigation for CDR.
The form, still in use, identifies Provident Life and Accident as the underwriter. Provident, however, sold that line of business to another carrier two years ago.
The form asks the applicant to certify that he or she has not been treated within the past five years for diseases of the circulatory, respiratory or digestive systems, liver or kidneys, brain or nervous system, or for any cancer, HIV or diabetes.
It does not provide that anyone with a history of such problems could take a medical exam to try to qualify for the insurance, notes Wolinksy. That, he says, is the crux of his lawsuit.
The sweeping nature of exclusions bars nearly all disabled people from buying the insurance, he argues. California law forbids insurers from excluding applicants for life insurance or charging them higher premiums except for reasons based on sound actuarial data, he says.