The Securities and Exchange Commission voted January 23 that
lawyers must inform companies' top executives, and even members of their
boards, of securities violations at the firm. However, the SEC's hotly
contested "noisy withdrawal provision" is "still a live wire," says John
Heine, an SEC spokesperson. The noisy withdrawal provision, which lawyers
have opposed, would require lawyers to snitch on corporate clients by
telling the SEC of a securities infraction at the firm, and then resign from
advising that firm if it failed to heed the lawyer's warnings.
The SEC extended the comment period on the noisy withdrawal provision for
60 days, and proposed an alternative rule that would require a corporation,
not a lawyer, to report a lawyer's resignation to the SEC. "Notice to the
public [of a lawyer's withdrawal] would come by way of the issuer [company]
filing an 8-K form" with the SEC, Heine says. The alternative proposal is
also open for a 60-day comment period.
Gene Cauley, a partner with the law firm Cauley Geller Bowman Coates &
Redman in Little Rock, Arkansas, says the SEC is being "cautious and
deliberate" by extending the comment period on the noisy withdrawal
provision "because it's such an important issue," and so many lawyers
"object to it."
The SEC also approved its rule requiring mutual funds and other
registered management investment companies to disclose their proxy voting
policies and procedures and their actual proxy votes cast. David Tittsworth,
executive director of the Investment Counsel Association of America (ICAA)
in Washington, D.C., clarified his group's objections to the rule. "We don't
argue with the broad principal that an advisor who has the authority to vote
proxies has a fiduciary duty to vote those proxies on behalf of the client,"
Tittsworth says. What's worrisome, he says, is the rule's nitty-gritty
details. "The [SEC's] proposed rule, for example, required advisors to keep
all records relating to even verbal communications that were material to any
proxy voting decision. That's really burdensome and unnecessary."
Tittsworth says he won't know if that requirement remains in the final
rule until it's released this week. "This is one where the devil is truly in
the details."
© Arc, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to TMSalesOperations@arc-network.com. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.