Rep. Waters Calls for Hearing on Advisor Exams

In letter to House Financial Services chairman, Waters says full committee should consider proposals, like her SEC user fees bill, to boost the number of advisor exams

Rep. Maxine Waters wants a hearing for her user fees bill. Rep. Maxine Waters wants a hearing for her user fees bill.

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Recent Changes in the Regulatory Landscape 2011 marked a major shift in the regulatory environment, as the SEC adopted rules for implementing the Dodd-Frank Act.  Many changes to Investment Advisers Act were authorized by Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act.  
  • Differences Between State and SEC Regulation of Investment Advisors States may impose licensing or registration requirements on IARs doing business in their jurisdiction, even if the IAR works for an SEC-registered firm.  States may investigate and prosecute fraud by any IAR in their jurisdiction, even if the individual works for an SEC-registered firm.

Citing the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “abysmal examination record” on investment advisors, Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California, ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee, on Friday called on the committee’s chairman, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, to convene a full committee hearing to consider “various legislative proposals” to boost the number of advisor exams.

One of the proposals that Waters said should be considered is H.R. 1627, the Investment Adviser Examination Improvement Act, authored by Waters and Rep. John Delaney, D-Maryland.

Waters' bill, which has been co-sponsored by 17 of the 28 Democrats on the committee and would authorize the SEC to collect user fees from advisors to improve examination frequency, has been languishing in the House since she reintroduced it last April.

Waters noted that her bill has been endorsed by the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee, the advisor community and investor advocates.

In her letter, Waters wrote that “even though the SEC is responsible for overseeing 11,000 advisors that manage nearly $50 trillion in assets, the agency examines these advisors only once every 12 years, and 40% of advisers have never been examined.”

She continued: “To put this in perspective, brokers and dealers registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) are examined every other year. Though the vast majority of investment advisors operate with integrity, Congress, the advisor community, investor advocates and the SEC all agree that the SEC’s levels of examination need to improve to help restore trust in our financial markets.”

Waters noted that “insufficient funding continues to undercut the SEC’s ability to oversee” advisors.

Waters also noted former House Financial Services Committee Chairman Spencer Bachus’ failed attempts to push through a bill that would have authorized a self-regulatory organization like FINRA to oversee advisors, as well as SEC Commissioner Daniel Gallagher’s recent idea to allow third-party exams of advisors.  

Waters reminded Hensarling that the committee’s oversight plan for the 113th Congress “makes clear it will ‘review proposals that would harmonize the frequency of examinations of broker-dealers and investment advisors.’”

Said Waters: “I believe the time is right for the committee to conduct this review. Hardworking Americans saving for the future, as well as the investor advisor community, deserve to know that everyone is complying with the law.”


Check out Advisory Industry Wants More Exams (and Will Pay for Them, Too) on ThinkAdvisor.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.