December 12, 2013

Pre-Crisis CDOs Haunt Merrill With $131.8M SEC Fine

Merrill failed to inform investors that a prominent hedge fund firm was selecting the underlying portfolios, SEC says

(Photo: AP) (Photo: AP)

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Where Are We Headed? The ultimate compliance goal is to help ensure that everyone associated with an advisory firm acts ethically at all times.  Advisors and RIAs should do the right thing, even when regulators are not looking over their shoulders.
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Information This information sheet contains general information about certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and selected rules under the Adviser’s Act.  It also provides information about the resources available from the SEC to help advisors understand and comply with these laws and rules.

Merrill Lynch agreed on Thursday to pay a whopping $131.8 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission after the agency charged Merrill with making faulty disclosures about collateral selection for two collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) that it structured and marketed to investors, and maintaining inaccurate books and records for a third CDO.

The deals took place between 2006 and 2007.

The SEC said Merrill failed to inform investors that hedge fund firm Magnetar Capital LLC had a third-party role and had significant influence over the selection of collateral for the CDOs Octans I CDO Ltd. and Norma CDO I Ltd. Magnetar bought the equity in the CDOs, and its interests were not necessarily aligned with those of other investors because it hedged its equity positions by shorting against the CDOs.

“Merrill Lynch marketed complex CDO investments using misleading materials that portrayed an independent process for collateral selection that was in the best interests of long-term debt investors,” said George Canellos, co-director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, in a statement. “Investors did not have the benefit of knowing that a prominent hedge fund firm with its own interests was heavily involved behind the scenes in selecting the underlying portfolios.”

Merrill Lynch consented to the entry of the order and agreed to pay disgorgement of $56.3 million, prejudgment interest of $19.2 million, and a penalty of $56.3 million. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Merrill Lynch agreed to a censure and is required to cease and desist from future violations of these sections of the Securities Act and Securities Exchange Act.

"We are pleased to resolve this matter, which predated Bank of America’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch," the firm said in a statement. It said its reserves from the third quarter would cover the fine.

The SEC released a detailed explanation of the charges, including the inaccurate books and records charges. It has also charged related parties.


Check out SEC Issues ‘Bad Actor’ Guidance Under Rule 506 on ThinkAdvisor.


Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.