SEC Approves Nasdaq’s $62 Million Facebook Settlement

Latest deal allows Wall Street to pursue further action

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Scope of the Fiduciary Duty Owed by Investment Advisors A fiduciary obligation goes beyond the suitability standard typically owed by registered representatives of broker-dealer firms to clients. The relationship is built on the premise that the advisor will always do the right thing for the person or entity receiving advice.
  • Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIA’s failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisor’s fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients’ transactions.

Talk about saving face. The SEC approved a plan on Monday for Nasdaq to pay customers as much as $62 million for losses stemming from last year's controversial Facebook IPO. Despite the settlement, Wall Street firms will still be able to “pursue further legal action” if they so choose.

Dow Jones Business News reports (ironically posted to the Nasdaq website) that Wall Street banks are estimated to have lost around $500 million from the delay in the opening of Facebook trading and subsequent confusion over individual trades.

UBS has said the Facebook debut cost it $356 million, and said in a statement Monday that it intended to recover from Nasdaq "the full extent of our losses." Dow Jones says a spokeswoman said the bank has already filed a demand for arbitration against Nasdaq with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

UBS on Monday said "the SEC's approval of the plan does not change our opinion," calling the payout "inadequate and insufficient." Citigroup, whose losses were estimated at about $20 million, had also urged regulators to reject Nasdaq's plan, calling the package too small, according to the news service.

Nasdaq's compensation plan has satisfied some of the firms damaged in the social network's rocky debut, including Knight Capital Group and Citadel, which lost around $35 million each trading the stock May 18, Dow Jones adds. UBS and Citigroup had also objected to Nasdaq's requirement, upheld by the SEC Monday, that any firms claiming compensation under the exchange's plan must waive legal claims against Nasdaq.

The social networking giant, Wall Street firms and the Nasdaq were all heavily criticized for what was largely seen as a disappointing debut last spring. At the time, AdvisorOne contributor Ron DeLegge said it was so bad, lead underwriter Morgan Stanley was forced to buy up FB shares to prevent them from dipping below its $38 offer price. The Wall Street Journal described Morgan Stanley as Facebook’s “stabilization agent.”


Read Popular Company, Unpopular Stock: What's Wrong With Facebook? by Ben Warwick on AdvisorOne.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.