August 21, 2012

SEC Hands Out First Whistleblower Award

$50,000 awarded to individual who helped agency stop a multimillion-dollar fraud

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • Scope of the Fiduciary Duty Owed by Investment Advisors A fiduciary obligation goes beyond the suitability standard typically owed by registered representatives of broker-dealer firms to clients. The relationship is built on the premise that the advisor will always do the right thing for the person or entity receiving advice.
  • Agency and Principal Transactions In passing Section 206(3) of the Investment Advisers Act, Congress recognized that principal and agency transactions can be harmful to clients. Such transactions create the opportunity for RIAs to engage in self-dealing.

SEC LogoThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced Tuesday that it has given out its first whistleblower award to an individual who helped the agency stop a multimillion-dollar fraud.

The award recipient, who asked the agency for anonymity, will receive $50,000, the first payout from the SEC’s program to reward people who provide evidence of securities fraud.

“The whistleblower program is already becoming a success,” said SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro, in a statement announcing the reward. “We’re seeing high-quality tips that are saving our investigators substantial time and resources.”

The award winner provided documents and other significant information that allowed the SEC’s investigation to move at an accelerated pace and prevent the fraud from ensnaring additional victims, the agency said. The whistleblower’s assistance led to a court ordering more than $1 million in sanctions, of which approximately $150,000 has been collected thus far. The SEC said the court is considering whether to issue a final judgment against other defendants in the matter. “Any increase in the sanctions ordered and collected will increase payments to the whistleblower,” the SEC said.

Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in the same statement that the whistleblower “provided the exact kind of information and cooperation we were hoping the whistleblower program would attract. Had this whistleblower not helped to uncover the full dimensions of the scheme, it is very likely that many more investors would have been victimized.”

The SEC did not approve a claim from a second individual seeking an award in this matter because the information provided did not lead to or significantly contribute to the SEC’s enforcement action, as required for an award.

The Dodd-Frank Act authorized the whistleblower program to reward individuals who offer high-quality original information that leads to an SEC enforcement action in which more than $1 million in sanctions is ordered. Awards can range from 10% to 30% of the money collected.

Dodd-Frank included enhanced anti-retaliation employment protections for whistleblowers and provisions to protect their identity. The law specifies that the SEC cannot disclose any information, including information the whistleblower provided to the SEC, which could reasonably be expected to directly or indirectly reveal a whistleblower’s identity.

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.