Morgan Stanley Pays $3.3 Million in SEC Crackdown on Fee Arrangements

Firm charged fees for third-party advisory services investors never received

SEC's Robert Khuzami (right) with Treasury's Tim Geithner. (Photo: AP) SEC's Robert Khuzami (right) with Treasury's Tim Geithner. (Photo: AP)

More On Legal & Compliance

from The Advisor's Professional Library
  • The Few and the Proud: Chief Compliance Officers CCOs make significant contributions to success of an RIA, designing and implementing compliance programs that prevent, detect and correct securities law violations.  When major compliance problems occur at firms, CCOs will likely receive regulatory consequences.    
  • Client Commission Practices and Soft Dollars RIAs should always evaluate whether the products and services they receive from broker-dealers are appropriate. The SEC suggested that an RIA’s failure to stay within the scope of the Section 28(e) safe harbor may violate the advisor’s fiduciary duty to clients, so RIAs must evaluate their soft dollar relationships on a regular basis to ensure they are disclosed properly and that they do not negatively impact the best execution of clients’ transactions.

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday charged Morgan Stanley Investment Management with violating securities laws in a fee arrangement that repeatedly charged a fund and its investors for advisory services they weren’t actually receiving from a third party.

MSIM agreed to pay more than $3.3 million to settle the SEC’s charges. “We want to take the advisory fee setting process out of the shadows by scrutinizing the role of investment advisors and fund board members in vetting fee arrangements with registered funds,” Robert Khuzami, director of the SEC's Enforcement Division, said.

The Division of Enforcement's Asset Management Unit is currently "inquiring into the investment advisory contract renewal process and fee arrangements in the fund industry,” said Khuzami, in announcing the action against Morgan Stanley.

The SEC’s investigation found that MSIM–the primary investment advisor to The Malaysia Fund–represented to investors and the fund’s board of directors that it contracted a Malaysian-based sub-advisor to provide advice, research and assistance to MSIM for the benefit of the fund, which invests in equity securities of Malaysian companies. However, the SEC say, "the sub-advisor did not provide these purported advisory services, yet the fund’s board annually renewed the contract based on MSIM’s representations for more than a decade at a total cost of $1.845 million to investors."

According to the SEC’s order, MSIM arranged The Malaysia Fund’s sub-advisory agreement with a subsidiary of AM Bank Group, one of the largest banking groups in Malaysia. "Despite the research and advisory agreement stating that the AM Bank Group subsidiary (AMMB) would provide MSIM with 'investment advice, research and assistance, as [MSIM] shall from time to time reasonably request," the SEC says it found that AMMB merely provided two monthly reports based on publicly available information that MSIM neither requested nor used in its management of the fund.

Furthermore, the SEC said, "MSIM’s oversight and involvement with AMMB during the relevant time period were wholly inadequate. MSIM had no written procedures specifically governing its oversight of sub-advisers, and did not have a procedure in place for reviewing work done by AMMB."

Reprints Discuss this story
This is where the comments go.