More On Legal & Compliancefrom The Advisor's Professional Library
- Pay-to-Play Rule Violating the pay-to-play rule can result in serious consequences, and RIAs should adopt robust policies and procedures to prevent and detect contributions made to influence the selection of the firm by a government entity.
- Meeting and Exceeding Clients and Regulators’ Expectations Although it can be difficult, there are ways for RIAs to meet or exceed client expectations, increase customer satisfaction, and help firms retain current clients and attract new ones.
An executive top-hat plan can be a great way to attract and retain highly qualified executives or supplement a business owner’s compensation, but the plans have a big downside. Because the plans are generally unfunded, major events at the sponsor, like a sale or insolvency, can devastate a plan and leave participants empty handed. The effect on a top-hat plan when a sponsor liquidates its assets is illustrated by the recent Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case, Feinberg v. RM Acquisition LLC, 629 F.3d 671 (2011).
The top-hat plan at issue in the case was a Rand McNally & Company Supplemental Pension Plan (“SERP Plan”). The plan provided an annuity to plan participants when they reached retirement age.
Rand McNally filed for bankruptcy in 2003, which was prior to the events precipitating the Feinberg case. The SERP was left “unimpaired” by the bankruptcy—debt created by the plan was not modified or discharged by the bankruptcy.
In 2007, RM Acquisition purchased Rand McNally’s assets and agreed to meet some, but not all, of its obligations. Essentially, the sale stripped Rand McNally of its assets, leaving a shell.
Although a sale of assets like this one won’t usually gut a qualified deferred compensation plan, since most such plans are funded, the plan at issue in this case was an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
Nonqualified deferred compensation plans offer businesses and their executives a tradeoff: although such plans can defer income tax liability on some executive income, the plans generally aren’t funded, meaning that creditors of the business have access to plan assets. So, if a company goes bankrupt or otherwise ceases to exist, plan funds can be siphoned off to pay the company’s creditors.
When a buyer purchases all of a company’s stock, the purchaser takes on all of the company’s debts—including liabilities of any non-qualified deferred compensation plans. But in a case like this, where the sale just liquidates the company’s assets, liabilities often don’t get transferred as part of the sale.
The SERP in this case was left in Rand McNally—which was a shell with no assets after the
sale. The top-hat plan was specifically excluded from inclusion in the sale as an assumed liability.
The plaintiff argued that the purchaser, RM Acquisition:
- had successor liability for the top-hat plan after the sale
- “connive[d] with Rand McNally to deprive participants of their top hat benefits” and
- was a “mere continuation of Rand McNally under another name.”
The court held against the plaintiffs, leaving plan participants without recourse for the benefits they were entitled to under their agreements with Rand McNally.
The case illustrates the dangers inherent in non-qualified plans. Although steps can be taken to minimize the danger ofa total plan meltdown, the risk can never be entirely eliminated without compromising the tax benefits provided by a non-qualified plan. In exchange for tax deferral and relative administrative ease, participants’ deferred compensation arrangements exist at the mercy of the plan sponsor.
For additional coverage of this issue and similar ones, including in-depth analysis of partnership taxation,sign up with AdvisorOne’s partner, AdvisorFX, for a free trial.
See also The Law Professor's blog at AdvisorFYI.